Compare trend and price AC vs FDS
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AC is a StrongBuy and FDS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.91% price change this week, while FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
AC is expected to report earnings on May 10, 2023.
FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-1.35% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.81% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| AC | FDS | AC / FDS | |
| Capitalization | 703M | 16.9B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 47.7M | 805M | 6% |
| Gain YTD | -8.905 | -9.828 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.85 | 35.83 | 53% |
| Revenue | 12.7M | 2.12B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 407M | 28.4M | 1,433% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.77B | - |
AC | FDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AC's Valuation (77) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FDS (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that AC’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AC (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew significantly faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's SMR Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AC (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as AC (72) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to AC’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AC (94) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.
| AC | FDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 2 days ago 52% |
FDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| SPGI - FDS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| MSCI - FDS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| MCO - FDS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| DNB - FDS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| EVR - FDS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||