AFG
Price
$131.13
Change
-$1.33 (-1.00%)
Updated
Apr 10, 11:48 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
11B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$39.01
Change
-$0.58 (-1.47%)
Updated
Apr 10, 11:33 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFG vs UFCS

Header iconAFG vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts AFG vs UFCSBanner chart's image
AFG vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFG vs. UFCS commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFG is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (AFG: $132.45 vs. UFCS: $39.63)
Brand notoriety: AFG and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFG: 76% vs. UFCS: 104%
Market capitalization -- AFG: $11B vs. UFCS: $1.02B
AFG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $11B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $129.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

AFG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +5.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.18% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFG($11B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($1.02B). AFG has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: AFG (13.14) vs UFCS (8.85). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 9.600 vs. AFG (-1.296). AFG has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. UFCS (1.27B). UFCS has less debt than AFG: UFCS (146M) vs AFG (1.82B). AFG has higher revenues than UFCS: AFG (8.12B) vs UFCS (1.39B).
AFGUFCSAFG / UFCS
Capitalization11B1.02B1,084%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.2969.600-13%
P/E Ratio13.148.85149%
Revenue8.12B1.39B585%
Total Cash2.35B1.27B185%
Total Debt1.82B146M1,247%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFG vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
AFG
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2169
SMR RATING
1..100
7159
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4880
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (48). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (69). This means that AFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (71). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (53). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (80). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFGUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTSL52.801.26
+2.44%
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X ETF
RVNL29.100.40
+1.39%
GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF
NVDY13.230.08
+0.62%
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
SYSB89.200.03
+0.03%
iShares Systematic Bond ETF
CWEB27.26-0.63
-2.26%
Direxion Dly CSI CHN Itnet Bull 2X Shrs

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+1.77%
SAFT - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
CINF - UFCS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
AFG - UFCS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
CNA - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
THG - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More