ASML
Price
$1459.80
Change
+$48.97 (+3.47%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
556.33B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTSI
Price
$276.97
Change
+$15.55 (+5.95%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.78B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASML vs MTSI

Header iconASML vs MTSI Comparison
Open Charts ASML vs MTSIBanner chart's image
ASML vs MTSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ASML Holding (ASML) vs. MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both ASML and MTSI have delivered strong YTD gains around 30%, reflecting semiconductor sector momentum driven by AI demand.
  • ASML, a leader in EUV lithography equipment, benefits from robust backlogs and analyst upgrades amid AI chip production growth.
  • MTSI focuses on analog RF semiconductors for data centers and telecom, with recent earnings beats and upbeat guidance fueling share gains.
  • ASML faces geopolitical export risks, while MTSI contends with higher volatility in component demand cycles.
  • Relative performance shows both stocks outperforming benchmarks, with MTSI's 120% one-year return highlighting momentum in data center applications.
  • Tickeron's AI bots trading semiconductor tickers like ASML demonstrate strong annualized returns up to 99% in recent simulations.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines ASML Holding N.V. and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI), two key players in the semiconductor ecosystem. ASML dominates advanced lithography equipment essential for cutting-edge chip manufacturing, while MTSI supplies analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, and data center applications. Traders and investors focused on AI-driven growth, semiconductor supply chains, and relative performance will find value in analyzing their market positioning, recent momentum, and sector exposures. Amid broader market volatility, both stocks offer insights into technology sector trends and trade-offs in growth versus stability.

ASML Overview and Recent Performance

ASML Holding N.V., headquartered in Veldhoven, Netherlands, is the global leader in photolithography systems, particularly extreme ultraviolet (EUV) technology critical for advanced semiconductor nodes. The company provides lithography, metrology, and inspection solutions to major chipmakers, enabling production of AI accelerators and high-performance computing chips. In recent market activity, ASML's shares have shown resilience, with YTD gains near 30% and a market cap exceeding $540 billion. Sentiment has been bolstered by a robust EUV backlog fueled by AI demand, analyst price target upgrades like Bank of America's lift to $1,886, and strong Q4 2025 results with €9.7 billion in sales. Geopolitical tensions, including U.S.-China export restrictions, have introduced volatility, but optimism persists due to long-term AI upcycle visibility and projected revenue growth through 2028.

MTSI Overview and Recent Performance

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI), based in Lowell, Massachusetts, designs and manufactures analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, millimeter wave, and lightwave applications. Its products serve telecom infrastructure, data centers, defense, and industrial markets, including amplifiers, switches, and subsystems for 5G/6G and optical networks. Recent weeks have seen MTSI shares reflect strong momentum, with YTD performance at about 30% and a one-year return over 120%, supported by a $16.7 billion market cap. Key drivers include Q4 2025 earnings beats with $271.6 million in revenue (up 24.5% YoY) and upbeat Q1 2026 guidance exceeding estimates. Positive sentiment stems from data center growth and participation in standards like active copper cables, though short-term pullbacks highlight cyclical risks in end-market demand.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots that analyze thousands of tickers using technical and fundamental strategies. These bots employ diverse approaches, including trend following, swing trading, hedging, and leveraged ETF plays across sectors like semiconductors, energy, and communications. Highlighted stats show annualized returns ranging from 17% to over 216%, win rates of 53% to 95%, and profit factors up to 25.8, with some bots trading up to 25 tickers and average durations from 1 day to 62 days. For instance, a semiconductor bot including ASML has achieved 99% annualized returns with a 69% win rate. This section spotlights bots best suited to current conditions, offering real-time signals for copy trading. Explore these high-potential options to enhance your strategy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ASML and MTSI operate in complementary semiconductor niches: ASML's capital equipment model focuses on high-value EUV systems with near-monopoly status, contrasting MTSI's consumable analog components for immediate deployment in networks. Growth drivers differ—ASML leverages AI fab expansions and EUV layers for sub-3nm nodes, while MTSI capitalizes on data center interconnects and 5G/6G ramps. Recent momentum favors MTSI's post-earnings surge versus ASML's steadier gains amid analyst upgrades. Risk factors include ASML's exposure to export curbs and cyclical capex, versus MTSI's higher P/E (101x) and customer concentration. Sector overlaps in AI amplify synergies, but ASML offers scale stability while MTSI provides agile growth trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTSI for its superior relative momentum, with 120% one-year returns and strong data center catalysts outpacing ASML's more stable but geopolitically constrained profile. Factors like earnings beats, upbeat guidance, and niche analog demand position MTSI probabilistically higher in short-to-medium term trends, though ASML's EUV dominance suggests catch-up potential on AI fab visibility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASML vs. MTSI commentary
Apr 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASML is a Hold and MTSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2026
Stock price -- (ASML: $1459.80 vs. MTSI: $276.97)
Brand notoriety: ASML and MTSI are both not notable
ASML represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MTSI is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASML: 147% vs. MTSI: 121%
Market capitalization -- ASML: $556.33B vs. MTSI: $20.78B
ASML [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $556.33B. MTSI’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $20.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $556.33B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $48.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $122.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the long-term than MTSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTSI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTSI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the short-term than MTSI.

Price Growth

ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while MTSI (@Semiconductors) price change was +7.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

MTSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.31% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASML($556B) has a higher market cap than MTSI($20.8B). MTSI has higher P/E ratio than ASML: MTSI (125.33) vs ASML (47.81). MTSI YTD gains are higher at: 61.706 vs. ASML (36.810). ASML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. MTSI (259M). ASML has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. MTSI (768M). MTSI has less debt than ASML: MTSI (531M) vs ASML (4.39B). ASML has higher revenues than MTSI: ASML (32.7B) vs MTSI (1.02B).
ASMLMTSIASML / MTSI
Capitalization556B20.8B2,673%
EBITDA12.6B259M4,865%
Gain YTD36.81061.70660%
P/E Ratio47.81125.3338%
Revenue32.7B1.02B3,203%
Total Cash13.3B768M1,732%
Total Debt4.39B531M827%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASML vs MTSI: Fundamental Ratings
ASML
MTSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1428
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
278
SMR RATING
1..100
1959
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASML's Valuation (75) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MTSI (83) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

MTSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (27) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MTSI’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (59) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

MTSI's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (40) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MTSI’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MTSI (44) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMLMTSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIRL74.751.89
+2.59%
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
FFGX33.700.66
+2.01%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
RVT18.050.31
+1.75%
Royce Value Trust
JMSI50.290.12
+0.24%
JPMorgan Sustainable Municipal Inc ETF
CPSY25.36N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan

ASML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASML has been closely correlated with ASMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASML jumps, then ASMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASML
1D Price
Change %
ASML100%
+3.47%
ASMLF - ASML
85%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
ASMIY - ASML
80%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
LRCX - ASML
80%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
KLAC - ASML
79%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
AMAT - ASML
77%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
More

MTSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSI has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTSI jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTSI
1D Price
Change %
MTSI100%
+5.95%
KLAC - MTSI
70%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
LRCX - MTSI
70%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
SITM - MTSI
69%
Closely correlated
+7.01%
VECO - MTSI
68%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
AMKR - MTSI
68%
Closely correlated
+7.11%
More