ASML
Price
$1502.05
Change
-$82.46 (-5.20%)
Updated
May 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
600.18B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$22.32
Change
+$1.15 (+5.43%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASML vs NVTS

Header iconASML vs NVTS Comparison
Open Charts ASML vs NVTSBanner chart's image
ASML vs NVTS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ASML Holding (ASML) vs. Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ASML boasts YTD returns of approximately 35%, driven by strong demand for EUV lithography in AI chip production, contrasting NVTS's 26% YTD amid revenue pivots.
  • Over the past year, NVTS delivered explosive 278% gains versus ASML's solid 107%, highlighting higher volatility in power semis.
  • ASML exhibits market stability with a $570B cap and profitability, while NVTS ($2B cap) reports losses but eyes high-power AI growth.
  • Recent ASML advancements in High-NA EUV bolster sentiment; NVTS pivots to AI data centers post-Q4 earnings beat.
  • Sector overlap in semiconductors positions both for AI tailwinds, but ASML leads in trend consistency and lower risk.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines ASML Holding N.V., a leader in photolithography equipment, and Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS), a developer of GaN and SiC power semiconductors. Both operate in the semiconductor ecosystem, benefiting from AI-driven demand for advanced chips and efficient power solutions. Traders seeking exposure to equipment stability versus high-growth power tech, and investors tracking relative performance in recent market activity, will find value in analyzing their business models, momentum, and positioning. This review draws on verifiable data from Yahoo Finance, Reuters, and company reports to highlight contrasts in a volatile sector.

ASML Overview and Recent Performance

ASML Holding N.V., headquartered in Veldhoven, Netherlands, dominates the lithography market, providing extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and deep ultraviolet (DUV) systems essential for advanced semiconductor nodes used in AI processors and logic chips. The company serves major foundries with hardware, software, and services, holding a near-monopoly on EUV technology.

In recent market activity, ASML shares have advanced around 35% YTD and over 100% in the past year, closing near $1,450 with a $570 billion market cap. Performance reflects robust 2025 results, with €32.7 billion in net sales (up 15%) and €9.6 billion net income, fueled by AI demand. Recent weeks saw breakthroughs in High-NA EUV tools achieving 80% uptime after processing 500,000 wafers, signaling mass production readiness. A €12 billion buyback and plans for AI-optimized packaging equipment have sustained positive sentiment, despite China exposure concerns.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS), based in Torrance, California, specializes in gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC) power ICs for efficient conversion in mobile chargers, data centers, EVs, and solar inverters. Founded in 2014, it targets next-generation power electronics.

Recent weeks brought volatility for NVTS, with shares around $9 and a $2 billion market cap, up 26% YTD but down from peaks amid restructuring. The stock surged 20% post-Q4 2025 earnings on February 24, reporting $7.3 million revenue (beating estimates despite 59% Y/Y drop) and a $0.05 non-GAAP loss in line with consensus. High-power markets like AI data centers overtook mobile for majority revenue, with Q1 guidance at $8-8.5 million signaling sequential growth. Partnerships like GlobalFoundries for U.S. GaN and new 650V GaN sampling have lifted sentiment, though ongoing losses and pivots temper gains.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds of agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical patterns, ML-driven predictions, hedging, and volatility plays—with timeframes from 5 minutes to daily. Only those excelling in current conditions, like semiconductor surges or AI themes, earn trending status. Featured bots boast annualized returns from +14% to +247%, win rates of 55-95%, profit factors up to 25.8, and drawdowns under $26,000 on model portfolios. Semiconductor bots, for instance, delivered +106% over 8 days on tickers including ASML, with 70% wins. Explore these for automated insights tailored to market shifts—visit Trending AI Robots to subscribe and track real-time signals.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ASML's capital-equipment model yields high margins (52% gross) and recurring service revenue, contrasting NVTS' fabless power semis focus with 39% margins amid scaling losses. Growth drivers diverge: ASML leverages EUV monopoly for 15-30% sales expansion via AI foundry capex; NVTS bets on $3.5B high-power SAM in AI/EV by 2030.

Recent momentum favors NVTS' 278% 1-year surge on pivot hype, but ASML's steadier 107% reflects lower beta (1.46 vs. 3.2). Risks include ASML's geopolitical curbs (25% China sales) and NVTS' execution in restructuring. Both expose to semis/AI, yet ASML offers upstream oligopoly stability versus NVTS' downstream growth trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors ASML due to superior trend consistency, profitability, and €44-60 billion 2030 revenue visibility amid AI lithography demand. NVTS shows promise in power efficiency catalysts, but higher volatility and losses suggest caution. Observable factors point to 60-70% higher probability of relative outperformance for ASML in stable conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASML vs. NVTS commentary
May 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASML is a Hold and NVTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ASML: $1584.51 vs. NVTS: $22.32)
Brand notoriety: ASML and NVTS are both not notable
ASML represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while NVTS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASML: 78% vs. NVTS: 129%
Market capitalization -- ASML: $600.18B vs. NVTS: $5.22B
ASML [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $600.18B. NVTS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $600.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.71T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $53.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $150.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the long-term than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the short-term than NVTS.

Price Growth

ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +4.48% price change this week, while NVTS (@Semiconductors) price change was +41.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +145.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+0.08% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+4.65% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASML($600B) has a higher market cap than NVTS($5.22B). NVTS YTD gains are higher at: 212.605 vs. ASML (49.147). ASML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.9B vs. NVTS (-70.64M). ASML has more cash in the bank: 8.38B vs. NVTS (221M). NVTS has less debt than ASML: NVTS (6.34M) vs ASML (2.71B). ASML has higher revenues than NVTS: ASML (33.7B) vs NVTS (40.5M).
ASMLNVTSASML / NVTS
Capitalization600B5.22B11,503%
EBITDA11.9B-70.64M-16,847%
Gain YTD49.147212.60523%
P/E Ratio52.21N/A-
Revenue33.7B40.5M83,210%
Total Cash8.38B221M3,790%
Total Debt2.71B6.34M42,695%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASML: Fundamental Ratings
ASML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMLNVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSGE27.550.11
+0.40%
Warren Street Global Equity ETF
VTV209.010.64
+0.31%
Vanguard Value ETF
SPE14.29-0.02
-0.14%
Special Opportunities Fund
FLSP27.08-0.07
-0.26%
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
HIBS25.69-0.53
-2.02%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Br 3X ETF

NVTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVTS
1D Price
Change %
NVTS100%
+5.43%
IFNNY - NVTS
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
TOELY - NVTS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
PENG - NVTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
AAOI - NVTS
42%
Loosely correlated
-8.75%
COHU - NVTS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
More