AVLV
Price
$85.37
Change
+$0.76 (+0.90%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
11.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CGDV
Price
$45.98
Change
+$0.59 (+1.30%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
31.59B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AVLV vs CGDV

Header iconAVLV vs CGDV Comparison
Open Charts AVLV vs CGDVBanner chart's image
AVLV vs CGDV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) vs. Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV)

Key Takeaways

  • AVLV offers broader diversification with 258 holdings versus CGDV's concentrated 53-58 holdings, reducing single-stock risk but potentially limiting upside from top performers.
  • CGDV emphasizes dividend income with heavy technology exposure (27%), while AVLV provides balanced sector exposure led by industrials, consumer cyclical, and energy.
  • AVLV's expense ratio of 0.15% is significantly lower than CGDV's 0.33%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both are actively managed large-cap value strategies, but AVLV targets profitability screens for value stocks, while CGDV focuses on dividend payers for income and growth.
  • CGDV shows higher concentration in top 10 holdings (around 40%), appealing to those seeking income from established dividend growers like MSFT and NVDA.
  • AVLV's higher energy and financials tilt positions it better for value rotations, contrasting CGDV's tech-heavy profile amid sector momentum shifts.

Introduction

In the current market environment, where value stocks navigate rotations between growth and cyclical sectors amid interest rate uncertainties and economic shifts, comparing AVLV and CGDV highlights distinct approaches within large-cap value ETFs. AVLV delivers broad U.S. large-cap value exposure with a profitability tilt, while CGDV prioritizes dividend-paying companies for income exceeding broad market yields. These ETFs appeal to investors seeking alternatives to passive benchmarks, offering active management to capture value opportunities. Their structural differences in diversification, costs, and sector bets make them relevant for portfolio construction targeting resilience and income in volatile cycles.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) Overview

The Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an actively managed fund seeking long-term capital appreciation by investing in U.S. large-cap companies trading at low valuations with high profitability ratios. It holds approximately 258 stocks, providing broad diversification across sectors. Top holdings include XOM (3.2%), MU (3.2%), META (2.9%), AAPL (2.8%), and CAT (2.6%). Sector allocations feature industrials (16%), consumer cyclical (16%), financial services (15%), technology (14%), and energy (13%). With a low expense ratio of 0.15%, AVLV employs a rules-based active strategy benchmarking the Russell 1000 Value Index, emphasizing efficient trading and low turnover for cost-effective exposure.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) Overview

The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an actively managed ETF aiming to generate income above the average U.S. stock yield while pursuing principal growth through dividend-paying large-cap stocks. It maintains a concentrated portfolio of about 53-58 holdings. Top holdings feature MSFT (5.4%), NVDA (5.0%), RTX (4.4%), AVGO (4.3%), and AMAT (4.2%), comprising roughly 40% of assets. Sectors are led by technology (27%), industrials (17%), healthcare (14%), and consumer cyclical (10%). The expense ratio stands at 0.33%, with a turnover of 29% and a benchmark of the S&P 500 Index, utilizing collaborative research for stock selection.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap value segment benefits from macroeconomic drivers like potential interest rate stabilization and sector rotation away from high-growth tech amid elevated valuations. Energy and financials gain from commodity trends and deregulation expectations, while industrials thrive on infrastructure spending. Dividend strategies like CGDV capitalize on capital flows to yield-enhancing assets during uncertainty. Regulatory scrutiny on big tech and geopolitical tensions underscore value's defensive appeal, though healthcare innovations and AI-driven industrials provide growth overlays. Both ETFs navigate risks from inflation persistence and election-year volatility, positioning value for outperformance in broadening market rallies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, CGDV has shown strength relative to AVLV, driven by its technology and industrials overweight amid AI and defense sector momentum, alongside resilient dividend payers. AVLV's heavier energy and financials exposure has lagged in growth-favoring cycles but offers relative stability during value rotations tied to commodity upswings and earnings recovery. Volatility profiles differ, with CGDV's concentration amplifying upside in bull phases but heightening drawdown risks, while AVLV's broader holdings provide smoother relative positioning. Performance ties to macro shifts like rate expectations, with both outperforming passive value benchmarks in extended cycles through active security selection.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, consistently profitable bots earn trending status, often delivering annualized returns in the double digits over tested periods. This curated section helps traders identify adaptive tools for ETFs like AVLV and CGDV. Explore the page to integrate cutting-edge AI into your strategy today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CGDV due to its superior trend consistency, dividend-driven income profile, and alignment with technology sector momentum, despite higher costs and concentration. AVLV's cost efficiency and diversification offer a close second for risk-averse value exposure. Probability leans 60-40 toward CGDV in the near term based on observable sector flows and structural yield advantages, though rotations could shift dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AVLV vs. CGDV commentary
Apr 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVLV is a Hold and CGDV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGDV has more net assets: 31.6B vs. AVLV (11.3B). AVLV has a higher annual dividend yield than CGDV: AVLV (12.990) vs CGDV (5.643). AVLV was incepted earlier than CGDV: AVLV (5 years) vs CGDV (4 years). AVLV (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGDV (0.33). CGDV has a higher turnover AVLV (7.00) vs AVLV (7.00).
AVLVCGDVAVLV / CGDV
Gain YTD12.9905.643230%
Net Assets11.3B31.6B36%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.3345%
Turnover7.0029.0024%
Yield1.211.3490%
Fund Existence5 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVLVCGDV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AVLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGDV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DAPP19.380.84
+4.53%
VanEck Digital Trfmt ETF
SGLC41.090.57
+1.40%
SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF
WTV98.661.22
+1.25%
WisdomTree US Value ETF
DXIV71.930.48
+0.67%
Dimensional International Vector Eq ETF
NNOV29.760.17
+0.58%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Nov

AVLV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVLV has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVLV jumps, then CE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVLV
1D Price
Change %
AVLV100%
+0.90%
CE - AVLV
79%
Closely correlated
-9.23%
KKR - AVLV
78%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
TKR - AVLV
77%
Closely correlated
+3.60%
SF - AVLV
77%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
USB - AVLV
76%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
More

CGDV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDV has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGDV jumps, then META could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGDV
1D Price
Change %
CGDV100%
+1.30%
META - CGDV
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
SWK - CGDV
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
NVDA - CGDV
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
JPM - CGDV
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
HAS - CGDV
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.07%
More