In the current market environment, where value stocks navigate rotations between growth and cyclical sectors amid interest rate uncertainties and economic shifts, comparing AVLV and CGDV highlights distinct approaches within large-cap value ETFs. AVLV delivers broad U.S. large-cap value exposure with a profitability tilt, while CGDV prioritizes dividend-paying companies for income exceeding broad market yields. These ETFs appeal to investors seeking alternatives to passive benchmarks, offering active management to capture value opportunities. Their structural differences in diversification, costs, and sector bets make them relevant for portfolio construction targeting resilience and income in volatile cycles.
The Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an actively managed fund seeking long-term capital appreciation by investing in U.S. large-cap companies trading at low valuations with high profitability ratios. It holds approximately 258 stocks, providing broad diversification across sectors. Top holdings include XOM (3.2%), MU (3.2%), META (2.9%), AAPL (2.8%), and CAT (2.6%). Sector allocations feature industrials (16%), consumer cyclical (16%), financial services (15%), technology (14%), and energy (13%). With a low expense ratio of 0.15%, AVLV employs a rules-based active strategy benchmarking the Russell 1000 Value Index, emphasizing efficient trading and low turnover for cost-effective exposure.
The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an actively managed ETF aiming to generate income above the average U.S. stock yield while pursuing principal growth through dividend-paying large-cap stocks. It maintains a concentrated portfolio of about 53-58 holdings. Top holdings feature MSFT (5.4%), NVDA (5.0%), RTX (4.4%), AVGO (4.3%), and AMAT (4.2%), comprising roughly 40% of assets. Sectors are led by technology (27%), industrials (17%), healthcare (14%), and consumer cyclical (10%). The expense ratio stands at 0.33%, with a turnover of 29% and a benchmark of the S&P 500 Index, utilizing collaborative research for stock selection.
The large-cap value segment benefits from macroeconomic drivers like potential interest rate stabilization and sector rotation away from high-growth tech amid elevated valuations. Energy and financials gain from commodity trends and deregulation expectations, while industrials thrive on infrastructure spending. Dividend strategies like CGDV capitalize on capital flows to yield-enhancing assets during uncertainty. Regulatory scrutiny on big tech and geopolitical tensions underscore value's defensive appeal, though healthcare innovations and AI-driven industrials provide growth overlays. Both ETFs navigate risks from inflation persistence and election-year volatility, positioning value for outperformance in broadening market rallies.
Over recent months, CGDV has shown strength relative to AVLV, driven by its technology and industrials overweight amid AI and defense sector momentum, alongside resilient dividend payers. AVLV's heavier energy and financials exposure has lagged in growth-favoring cycles but offers relative stability during value rotations tied to commodity upswings and earnings recovery. Volatility profiles differ, with CGDV's concentration amplifying upside in bull phases but heightening drawdown risks, while AVLV's broader holdings provide smoother relative positioning. Performance ties to macro shifts like rate expectations, with both outperforming passive value benchmarks in extended cycles through active security selection.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, consistently profitable bots earn trending status, often delivering annualized returns in the double digits over tested periods. This curated section helps traders identify adaptive tools for ETFs like AVLV and CGDV. Explore the page to integrate cutting-edge AI into your strategy today.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CGDV due to its superior trend consistency, dividend-driven income profile, and alignment with technology sector momentum, despite higher costs and concentration. AVLV's cost efficiency and diversification offer a close second for risk-averse value exposure. Probability leans 60-40 toward CGDV in the near term based on observable sector flows and structural yield advantages, though rotations could shift dynamics.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| AVLV | CGDV | AVLV / CGDV | |
| Gain YTD | 12.990 | 5.643 | 230% |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 31.6B | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 29.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.34 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
| AVLV | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 68% | 20 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVLV has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVLV jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVLV | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| CE - AVLV | 79% Closely correlated | -9.23% | ||
| KKR - AVLV | 78% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| TKR - AVLV | 77% Closely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| SF - AVLV | 77% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| USB - AVLV | 76% Closely correlated | +2.61% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDV has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGDV jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDV | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| META - CGDV | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| SWK - CGDV | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| NVDA - CGDV | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| JPM - CGDV | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| HAS - CGDV | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.07% | ||
More | ||||