BC
Price
$95.70
Change
+$2.41 (+2.58%)
Updated
Mar 27, 6:59 PM EST
28 days until earnings call
HAS
Price
$56.48
Change
+$1.87 (+3.42%)
Updated
Mar 27, 6:59 PM EST
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BC vs HAS ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconBC vs HAS Comparison
Open Charts BC vs HASBanner chart's image
Brunswick
Price$95.70
Change+$2.41 (+2.58%)
Volume$238.08K
CapitalizationN/A
Hasbro
Price$56.48
Change+$1.87 (+3.42%)
Volume$681.53K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BC vs HAS Comparison Chart

Loading...

BCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
HASDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BC vs. HAS commentary
Mar 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BC is a Hold and HAS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 28, 2024
Stock price -- (BC: $95.71 vs. HAS: $56.48)
Brand notoriety: BC and HAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BC: 83% vs. HAS: 72%
Market capitalization -- BC: $6.5B vs. HAS: $7.84B
BC [@Recreational Products] is valued at $6.5B. HAS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $7.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BC is a better buy in the long-term than HAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BC is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

BC (@Recreational Products) experienced а +3.89% price change this week, while HAS (@Recreational Products) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BC is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2024.

HAS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.05% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for HAS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than BC($6.5B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than BC: HAS (75.76) vs BC (15.61). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 12.164 vs. BC (-0.605). BC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. HAS (-863.2M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 545M vs. BC (469M). BC has less debt than HAS: BC (2.59B) vs HAS (3.5B). BC has higher revenues than HAS: BC (6.4B) vs HAS (5B).
BCHASBC / HAS
Capitalization6.5B7.84B83%
EBITDA1.01B-863.2M-117%
Gain YTD-0.60512.164-5%
P/E Ratio15.6175.7621%
Revenue6.4B5B128%
Total Cash469M545M86%
Total Debt2.59B3.5B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BC vs HAS: Fundamental Ratings
BC
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32100
SMR RATING
1..100
4898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (22) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (35). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

BC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAS (100). This means that BC’s stock grew significantly faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

BC's SMR Rating (48) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (98). This means that BC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

BC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (46). This means that BC’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (18). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
HASDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWK114.702.19
+1.95%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
ACV23.630.18
+0.77%
Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund
MMSC19.460.12
+0.59%
First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF
CXH7.670.03
+0.39%
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
SCHP52.160.17
+0.33%
Schwab US TIPS ETF™

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been closely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+3.42%
MAT - HAS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
PII - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.87%
BC - HAS
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
FNKO - HAS
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
HOG - HAS
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
More