Advertisement
BK vs WFC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bank of New York Mellon (BK) vs. Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BK has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 16%, outpacing WFC's roughly 12% gain, driven by robust Q1 results.
- BK reported Q1 2026 EPS of $2.25, beating estimates, with revenue up 13% year-over-year to $5.4 billion.+Releases+Q1+2026+Earnings)
- WFC posted Q1 net income of $5.3 billion and revenue of $21.45 billion but missed revenue expectations, leading to initial stock pressure.
- In recent market activity, BK gained over 13% in the past month, compared to WFC's modest 1% rise.
- Analysts have raised price targets for BK post-earnings, with several above $140, signaling positive sentiment.
- WFC offers a higher dividend yield at 2.2% versus BK's 1.6%, appealing to income-focused investors.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines BK and WFC, two major players in the banking sector with distinct business models—one focused on asset servicing and custody, the other on retail and commercial lending. Investors seeking diversified exposure to financial services, particularly amid shifting interest rates and economic signals, may find value in evaluating their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. Traders monitoring banking sector momentum will appreciate insights into recent earnings, sentiment, and head-to-head metrics in today's dynamic market environment.
BK Overview and Recent Performance
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK), a leading global custody bank and asset servicer, manages trillions in assets under custody (AUC) and provides investment management services. In recent market activity, BK stock has shown resilience, trading around $134 with a market cap of about $92 billion. Its trailing P/E ratio stands at 16.6, reflecting solid profitability with EPS of $8.07. Q1 2026 results highlighted strength in fee income and net interest income (NII, revenue from interest-bearing assets minus costs), driving 13% revenue growth to $5.4 billion and EPS of $2.25, surpassing forecasts. Positive analyst reactions, including raised price targets from firms like Barclays and Morgan Stanley, have bolstered sentiment amid higher trading volumes and a 52-week high near $139.
WFC Overview and Recent Performance
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is a diversified financial institution emphasizing consumer banking, commercial lending, and wealth management, with a market cap exceeding $250 billion. Shares recently hovered near $81, with a lower trailing P/E of 12.6 and EPS of $6.47, alongside a dividend yield of 2.2%. Recent quarters showed net income growth to $5.3 billion in Q1 2026, supported by a 6% revenue increase to $21.45 billion, though it fell short of expectations, prompting some investor caution. Factors like net interest margin (NIM, spread between interest earned and paid) pressures and macroeconomic warnings on energy prices have influenced performance, with the stock within a 52-week range of $69-$98.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from technical pattern recognition to fundamental analysis—across timeframes like 5-minute scalps, 60-minute swings, and longer holds, with risk profiles suited to low, medium, or high volatility markets. The 25 featured trending robots are selected based on AI-driven relevance to current conditions, showcasing metrics such as win rates, profit factors, maximum drawdowns, and average gains to help users identify high-potential opportunities. Explore these bots to enhance your trading with data-backed automation tailored to evolving market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BK’s custody and asset servicing model offers fee-based stability less tied to loan growth or credit cycles, contrasting WFC’s exposure to consumer lending and deposits vulnerable to rate changes. Growth drivers differ: BK benefits from rising AUC and market volatility boosting securities services, while WFC relies on NIM expansion and non-interest revenue from cards and advisory. Recent momentum favors BK with superior short-term gains, though WFC’s larger scale provides diversification. Risk factors include regulatory scrutiny for both, but WFC faces higher credit risk (non-performing loans). Market sentiment leans positive for BK via analyst upgrades, while WFC trades at a valuation discount.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward BK with higher probability for near-term upside, based on trend consistency post-Q1 beat, elevated analyst targets, and stronger relative momentum in recent weeks. WFC remains viable for value and yield but trails in catalysts amid revenue concerns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BK is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BK (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -6.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
BK is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-1.20% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| BK | WFC | BK / WFC | |
| Capitalization | 92.7B | 225B | 41% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.285 | -20.383 | -85% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.75 | 11.35 | 148% |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 85B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 5.11B | 33.5B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 33.8B | 216B | 16% |
BK | WFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WFC's Valuation (68) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BK (87). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BK’s over the last 12 months.
BK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (33). This means that BK’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
WFC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BK (7). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BK’s over the last 12 months.
BK's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFC (64). This means that BK’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.
BK's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFC (68). This means that BK’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.
| BK | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 10 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
BK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BK has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BK jumps, then STT could also see price increases.
WFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.