Advertisement
BTI vs CL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTI is a Hold and CL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BTI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BTI (@Tobacco) experienced а +11.68% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
BTI is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tobacco (+4.39% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
@Household/Personal Care (-1.57% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| BTI | CL | BTI / CL | |
| Capitalization | 142B | 70.5B | 201% |
| EBITDA | 14.1B | 3.9B | 362% |
| Gain YTD | 16.631 | 12.909 | 129% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.78 | 34.16 | 40% |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 20.8B | 123% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.34B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 7.97B | - |
BTI | CL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTI's Valuation (15) in the Tobacco industry is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BTI’s stock grew significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
BTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (68) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTI (99) in the Tobacco industry. This means that CL’s stock grew significantly faster than BTI’s over the last 12 months.
BTI's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as CL (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BTI’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTI (87) in the Tobacco industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTI’s over the last 12 months.
| BTI | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 35% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 44% | 28 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 36% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
BTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTI has been loosely correlated with MO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTI jumps, then MO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTI | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| MO - BTI | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| IMBBY - BTI | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| PM - BTI | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BTAFF - BTI | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| UVV - BTI | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.