This stock comparison examines BUD and BUDFF, both tied to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, the world's largest brewer. Investors and traders analyzing relative performance, liquidity, and market positioning will find value here, particularly those focused on consumer staples with global exposure. As different U.S. listings of the same entity, they highlight trade-offs in trading efficiency amid recent company catalysts like manufacturing expansions and earnings anticipation. This analysis draws on verifiable data to aid informed decision-making in the current market environment.
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD), listed on the NYSE as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), is a holding company producing and distributing beers like Budweiser, Corona, and Stella Artois, alongside non-alcoholic beverages. With a market capitalization exceeding $146 billion, it operates globally across high-end, mainstream, and low-end segments.
In recent market activity, BUD has traded around $75-76, within a 52-week range of $57 to $81. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately 17%, reflecting resilience in consumer staples. Key influences include Q4 2025 results showing 2% revenue growth and 4.9% EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) rise, driven by 4.4% revenue per hectoliter gains from premiumization. Recent weeks feature U.S. manufacturing investments totaling $600 million over two years and marketing partnerships for events like the FIFA World Cup 2026, bolstering sentiment ahead of Q1 earnings.
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUDFF), traded on the OTC Pink market, mirrors the core business of its NYSE counterpart, focusing on beverage production and distribution worldwide. It shares identical fundamentals, including a market cap over $146 billion and PE ratio (price-to-earnings) around 22.
Recent performance for BUDFF aligns closely, hovering near $76 within a 52-week range of $57 to $81, with year-to-date gains around 17%. The same corporate developments—such as EBITDA expansion and U.S. investment commitments—underpin price stability. Trading volume averages 45,000 shares daily, lower than major exchanges, which may impact execution during volatile periods. Overall sentiment remains tied to the company's global volume trends and premium brand momentum in recent quarters.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots feature win rates ranging from 51% to 88%, with standout annualized returns up to 163% for select strategies like those targeting semiconductors or energy sectors. Examples include bots with 68-74% win rates on 5-60 minute timeframes, executing hundreds of trades via AI/ML-driven trend following, dip buying, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Diverse styles—signal agents, virtual agents, swing trading—cater to various risk appetites and market conditions. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to align with personalized strategies amid dynamic markets.
Both BUD and BUDFF share the same business model: a diversified beverage portfolio emphasizing premiumization and non-alcoholic growth, with exposure to stable consumer staples amid economic shifts. Growth drivers like U.S. manufacturing boosts and global brand campaigns apply equally.
Recent momentum is comparable, with aligned YTD gains and price levels, though BUD shows steadier intraday ranges due to higher liquidity. Risk factors, including debt levels (total debt/equity around 75%) and volume sensitivity in key markets, are identical. BUD edges in sector accessibility for U.S. institutions, while BUDFF may appeal to those seeking OTC exposure. Market sentiment favors the NYSE listing for execution efficiency, highlighting liquidity as the primary trade-off.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor BUD over BUDFF in the current environment, based on superior trend consistency from elevated trading volume and NYSE positioning. While fundamentals and catalysts are identical, BUD's liquidity reduces slippage risks, offering better relative stability for short- to medium-term positioning ahead of earnings.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To understand the difference between Anheuser-Busch In Bev SA/NV - ADR (BUD) vs. Anheuser-Busch In Bev SA/NV (BUDFF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBUDFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BUDFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while BUDFF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.
BUD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| BUD | BUDFF | BUD / BUDFF | |
| Capitalization | 156B | 155B | 101% |
| EBITDA | 15.8B | 15.8B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 27.948 | 24.864 | 112% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.37 | 22.02 | 102% |
| Revenue | 61B | 61B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 5.28B | 11.8B | 45% |
| Total Debt | 73B | 73B | 100% |
BUD | BUDFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BUD's Valuation (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUDFF (53) in the null industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUDFF (77) in the null industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's SMR Rating (76) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUDFF (76) in the null industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUDFF (47) in the null industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
BUDFF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BUD (37) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | BUDFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 10 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAPD | 11.88 | 0.04 | +0.30% |
| Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | |||
| AFMC | 39.14 | 0.08 | +0.20% |
| First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| GJP | 24.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed Income Securities on the behalf of STRATS for Dominion Resources Series 2005-6 | |||
| VGSH | 58.25 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | |||
| PIZ | 57.88 | -0.78 | -1.33% |
| Invesco DW Developed Markets Momt ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ABEV - BUD | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUDFF has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUDFF jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUDFF | 100% | +1.35% | ||
| BUD - BUDFF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| PRNDY - BUDFF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| ABEV - BUDFF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DEO - BUDFF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| CABJF - BUDFF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||