Advertisement
BUD vs CL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUD is a Buy and CL is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +7.30% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.19% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Household/Personal Care (+1.00% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| BUD | CL | BUD / CL | |
| Capitalization | 154B | 70.1B | 220% |
| EBITDA | 15.8B | 3.9B | 405% |
| Gain YTD | 26.601 | 12.166 | 219% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.13 | 33.93 | 65% |
| Revenue | 61B | 20.8B | 293% |
| Total Cash | 5.28B | 1.34B | 396% |
| Total Debt | 73B | 7.97B | 916% |
BUD | CL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BUD's Valuation (52) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for BUD (76) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew significantly faster than BUD’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BUD (39) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 55% | 21 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EYLD | 46.35 | 0.66 | +1.44% |
| Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| DYNF | 65.77 | 0.57 | +0.87% |
| iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF | |||
| RFCI | 22.39 | 0.06 | +0.25% |
| ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF | |||
| UAPR | 34.79 | 0.06 | +0.18% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Apr | |||
| FLXR | 39.26 | 0.05 | +0.13% |
| TCW Flexible Income ETF | |||
BUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| ABEV - BUD | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.