Advertisement
BUD vs PG
BUD vs PG Stock Comparison: Earnings Recap + Recent Results Breakdown
Key Takeaways
- Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) reported Q4 2025 underlying EPS of $0.95, up 7.5% year-over-year, with FY 2025 revenue growth of 2.0% and normalized EBITDA up 4.4% to $21.2 billion.
- Procter & Gamble (PG) delivered Q2 FY2026 core EPS of $1.88, flat year-over-year, with net sales up 1% to $22.2 billion but organic sales unchanged.
- BUD showcased margin expansion of 101 basis points to 35.8% for FY 2025, alongside $11.3 billion in free cash flow.
- PG maintained FY2026 guidance for organic sales growth of 0% to 4% and core EPS growth of 0% to 4%.
- BUD guided for 4%-8% organic EBITDA growth in 2026, highlighting premiumization and beyond-beer expansion.
- Both companies demonstrate resilience amid consumer challenges, with BUD showing stronger top-line momentum in recent results.
Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters
Anheuser-Busch InBev and Procter & Gamble represent contrasting consumer staples giants: BUD as the global beer leader with brands like Budweiser and Stella Artois, and PG as a diversified household and personal care powerhouse with Tide, Pampers, and Gillette. Earnings reports provide critical insights into pricing power, volume trends, and margin discipline in a dynamic environment marked by shifting consumer preferences and economic pressures. Comparing their latest results highlights strategies in premiumization for BUD and innovation-driven stability for PG, offering investors a lens on defensive growth potential across beverages and essentials.
Anheuser-Busch InBev Focus
Anheuser-Busch InBev released its Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 12, 2026. For the fourth quarter, revenue rose 4.0% on a constant currency basis, driven by 2.5% revenue per hectoliter growth despite a 1.5% volume decline. Normalized EBITDA increased 2.3%, though margins contracted 10 basis points. Underlying EPS reached $0.95, a 7.5% improvement year-over-year.
Full-year performance was robust: revenue grew 2.0% (constant currency), fueled by 4.4% revenue per hectoliter expansion and megabrands up 4.1%. Normalized EBITDA rose 4.4% to $21.2 billion, with margins expanding 101 basis points to 35.8%. Volumes fell 2.3%, but underlying EPS climbed 6.0% to $3.73. Free cash flow hit $11.3 billion, supporting a proposed total FY2025 dividend of €1.15 per share and a $6 billion share buyback. For 2026, BUD targets 4%-8% organic EBITDA growth.
Procter & Gamble Context
Procter & Gamble reported Q2 fiscal 2026 results on January 22, 2026. Net sales increased 1% to $22.2 billion, but organic sales held flat as 1% pricing gains offset 1% volume declines and neutral mix. Core EPS remained steady at $1.88, beating consensus estimates, while diluted EPS dipped 5% to $1.78 due to restructuring charges. Seven of ten core categories held or grew organic sales, with strength in Fabric & Home Care and Baby & Feminine Care.
PG reaffirmed FY2026 guidance: organic sales growth of 0% to 4%, core EPS growth of 0% to 4% ($6.83-$7.09 range), and adjusted free cash flow productivity of 85%-90%. The company anticipates neutral commodity impacts, a modest FX tailwind, and plans $10 billion in dividends plus $5 billion in repurchases.
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
BUD outperformed on growth metrics, with FY revenue up 2% and EBITDA margins expanding significantly, contrasting PG's flat organic sales and stable core EPS. BUD's premium brands and beyond-beer segment (up 23%) drove revenue per hectoliter, mitigating volume softness, while PG faced U.S. market headwinds but leveraged pricing resilience. Risk profiles differ: BUD's higher debt (2.87x net debt/EBITDA) versus PG's pristine balance sheet exposes it to interest rates, but BUD's $11.3 billion FCF underscores deleveraging progress. Sentiment favors BUD's 2026 EBITDA guidance (4%-8%) over PG's modest outlook, though PG offers superior stability and dividend yield consistency.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, including trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum plays, with varying timeframes from intraday to long-term. The curated trending section highlights only the strongest current performers, often displaying win rates above 60%, average returns ranging from 10-30% in recent periods, and risk-adjusted metrics like Sharpe ratios. These bots adapt dynamically to volatility, sector rotations, and earnings catalysts, offering retail and institutional traders data-backed signals without emotional bias. Explore the page to identify bots aligned with your risk tolerance and portfolio goals.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron AI currently favors BUD with moderate probability (60-70%) due to superior earnings growth, margin expansion, and aggressive 2026 EBITDA guidance, outweighing PG's steadier but flatter profile. BUD's premiumization trend and cash generation enhance upside potential amid consumer recovery, though PG remains the lower-volatility anchor.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUD is a Hold and PG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-1.10% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Household/Personal Care (-2.66% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| BUD | PG | BUD / PG | |
| Capitalization | 156B | 332B | 47% |
| EBITDA | 15.8B | 24.9B | 63% |
| Gain YTD | 27.948 | 1.043 | 2,679% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.37 | 20.86 | 107% |
| Revenue | 61B | 86.7B | 70% |
| Total Cash | 5.28B | 12.3B | 43% |
| Total Debt | 73B | 37B | 197% |
BUD | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PG's Valuation (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BUD (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BUD (67) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (32) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUD (76) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUD’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (70) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD’s stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 10 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 25 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 23% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAPD | 11.88 | 0.04 | +0.30% |
| Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | |||
| AFMC | 39.14 | 0.08 | +0.20% |
| First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| GJP | 24.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed Income Securities on the behalf of STRATS for Dominion Resources Series 2005-6 | |||
| VGSH | 58.25 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | |||
| PIZ | 57.88 | -0.78 | -1.33% |
| Invesco DW Developed Markets Momt ETF | |||
BUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ABEV - BUD | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||