Advertisement
CAJPY vs SMCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAJPY is a StrongBuy and SMCI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMCI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SMCI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAJPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAJPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SMCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CAJPY (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while SMCI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
SMCI is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+2.23% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| CAJPY | SMCI | CAJPY / SMCI | |
| Capitalization | 24.4B | 13.9B | 176% |
| EBITDA | 538B | 1.21B | 44,500% |
| Gain YTD | -5.550 | -20.670 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.06 | 16.95 | 71% |
| Revenue | 4.55T | 28.1B | 16,199% |
| Total Cash | 722B | 4.09B | 17,648% |
| Total Debt | 1.12T | 4.91B | 22,770% |
CAJPY | SMCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAJPY's Valuation (5) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMCI (51) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMCI’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMCI (84) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMCI’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's SMR Rating (6) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMCI (57) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMCI’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as SMCI (90) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to SMCI’s over the last 12 months.
SMCI's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAJPY (96) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that SMCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
| CAJPY | SMCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 56% | 12 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACVF | 49.51 | 0.12 | +0.24% |
| American Conservative Values ETF | |||
| NOBL | 108.11 | 0.24 | +0.22% |
| ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats | |||
| SZNE | 37.14 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Pacer CFRA-Stovall Eq WghtSeasnlRottnETF | |||
| TVC | 24.43 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
| TLTD | 98.53 | -0.28 | -0.29% |
| FlexShares Mstar DevMks exUS FctTilt ETF | |||
CAJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAJPY has been loosely correlated with SEKEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAJPY jumps, then SEKEY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| SEKEY - CAJPY | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| HPQ - CAJPY | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| LOGI - CAJPY | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| SMCI - CAJPY | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| SSYS - CAJPY | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
SMCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMCI has been loosely correlated with DELL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMCI jumps, then DELL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMCI | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| DELL - SMCI | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| CRSR - SMCI | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| LOGI - SMCI | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| QMCO - SMCI | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| UMAC - SMCI | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
More | ||||