In the volatile precious metals sector, CDE and RGLD offer distinct ways to gain exposure to gold and silver. Coeur Mining (CDE) focuses on direct production, while Royal Gold (RGLD) generates revenue through streaming and royalties. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning amid fluctuating commodity prices. Traders seeking high-momentum plays may eye CDE, while those prioritizing stability could prefer RGLD. Investors benefit from understanding these contrasts for relative performance evaluation in today's market.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is a U.S.-based gold and silver producer operating mines in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The company explores and produces gold, silver, zinc, and lead, selling concentrates under off-take agreements. In recent market activity, CDE shares have experienced volatility, with year-to-date gains around 1% but impressive one-year returns over 226%. Key influences include the completion of a $385.8 million note exchange tied to the New Gold acquisition, bolstering its balance sheet with $553.6 million in cash. Strong Q4 2025 production, improved cash flows, and upcoming earnings have supported sentiment, though precious metals price swings have pressured short-term momentum. Trading near $17.65 with a market cap of approximately $18 billion, CDE exhibits a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 18.58.
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) acquires and manages precious metal streams and royalties across multiple continents, financing projects in exchange for future production shares. This model spans gold, silver, copper, and other metals without direct mining risks. Recent performance shows year-to-date returns of about 4%, with one-year gains of 30%, reflecting resilience amid sector volatility. Shares trade around $230 with a market cap near $19.6 billion, a trailing P/E of 34.47, and EPS (earnings per share) of $6.69. Factors include UBS's Buy rating with a $325 target, roadshow participation, and analyst views favoring royalties over miners due to cost pressures. Q4 2025 revenues hit $375 million, with earnings due soon; gold price trends have influenced steady sentiment despite recent dips.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML pattern recognition, trend following, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes and trade durations spanning hours to weeks. Standouts show annualized returns of 24% to 163% (averaging around 70%), win rates of 51-88% (typically 60-70%), and profit factors of 1.5-11.7. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with 68-97% returns and volatility plays exceeding 160%. While none specifically target CDE or RGLD, some include precious metals miners. Explore these for real-time signals tailored to current conditions.
CDE and RGLD both leverage precious metals but diverge in business models: CDE's hands-on production exposes it to operational costs and execution risks, while RGLD's royalty streams deliver predictable cash flows with minimal capex. Growth drivers favor CDE's recent acquisitions and production ramps, yielding higher momentum, versus RGLD's steady portfolio expansion. Recent momentum shows CDE more sensitive to metals prices, with weekly declines around 8%, compared to RGLD's relative steadiness. Risk factors highlight RGLD's lower beta and dividend as trade-offs for CDE's upside potential. Sector exposure overlaps in gold/silver, but royalties shield RGLD from mining costs amid volatility. Market sentiment tilts toward CDE for growth and RGLD for quality.
Tickeron's AI currently favors RGLD in this matchup, owing to its trend consistency, lower volatility, dividend support, and positioning as a royalty play resilient to recent precious metals corrections and cost pressures on producers. While CDE offers stronger historical momentum, RGLD's stability and analyst backing provide a probabilistic edge in the prevailing environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.76% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.64%.
CDE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
RGLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| CDE | RGLD | CDE / RGLD | |
| Capitalization | 20.5B | 20.8B | 99% |
| EBITDA | 1.31B | 1.03B | 127% |
| Gain YTD | 11.049 | 10.710 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.97 | 29.67 | 54% |
| Revenue | 2.57B | 1.31B | 196% |
| Total Cash | 843M | 234M | 360% |
| Total Debt | 773M | 596M | 130% |
CDE | RGLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLD's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (75). This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (51). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
CDE's SMR Rating (63) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (64). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
CDE's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (53). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (87). This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.
| CDE | RGLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |