Advertisement
CL vs COST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and COST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOST’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- COST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while COST (@Discount Stores) price change was +2.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
COST is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.41% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Discount Stores (-2.23% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| CL | COST | CL / COST | |
| Capitalization | 71.1B | 462B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 3.9B | 14.1B | 28% |
| Gain YTD | 13.819 | 21.087 | 66% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.43 | 54.15 | 64% |
| Revenue | 20.8B | 286B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 18.2B | 7% |
| Total Debt | 7.97B | 8.17B | 98% |
CL | COST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COST's Valuation (94) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as COST (33) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CL (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AGIX | 44.46 | 0.68 | +1.55% |
| KraneShares Artfcl Intllgnc and Tech ETF | |||
| ONEQ | 104.89 | 1.06 | +1.02% |
| Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF | |||
| XSEP | 44.00 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep | |||
| STAX | 25.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Nomura Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF | |||
| IXP | 124.27 | -0.80 | -0.64% |
| iShares Global Comm Services ETF | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
COST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| WMT - COST | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| BJ - COST | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| PSMT - COST | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| TGT - COST | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| DLMAF - COST | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||