Advertisement
CL vs KO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and KO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +117461.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
KO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.41% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-2.37% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CL | KO | CL / KO | |
| Capitalization | 71.1B | 346B | 21% |
| EBITDA | 3.9B | 19.2B | 20% |
| Gain YTD | 13.819 | 15.868 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.43 | 25.30 | 136% |
| Revenue | 20.8B | 49.3B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 13.8B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 7.97B | 43.9B | 18% |
CL | KO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 31 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KO (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | KO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 31% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 25% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 44% | 8 days ago 30% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 30% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 29% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AGIX | 44.46 | 0.68 | +1.55% |
| KraneShares Artfcl Intllgnc and Tech ETF | |||
| ONEQ | 104.89 | 1.06 | +1.02% |
| Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF | |||
| XSEP | 44.00 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep | |||
| STAX | 25.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Nomura Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF | |||
| IXP | 124.27 | -0.80 | -0.64% |
| iShares Global Comm Services ETF | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.