Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs OWVAX
CMBFX vs OWVAX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs OWVAX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.5M
Sterling Capital WV Interm Tax-Free I
Price$9.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.69M
CMBFX vs OWVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. OWVAX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and OWVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. OWVAX (49.7M). OWVAX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: OWVAX (2.88) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than OWVAX: CMBFX (41 years) vs OWVAX (32 years). OWVAX (0.63) and CMBFX (0.60) have similar cost to investors . OWVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.08 vs. CMBFX (12.00). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWVAX: CMBFX (2000) vs OWVAX (1000000). OWVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.64 vs. CMBFX (3.41). OWVAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.18 vs. CMBFX (2.95).
| CMBFX | OWVAX | CMBFX / OWVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.63 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.885 | 4.239 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 49.7M | 598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.88 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.41 | 3.64 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.74 | 10.04 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 4.18 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.34 | 18.51 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers