Advertisement
CMI vs FLS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs. Flowserve Corporation (FLS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CMI has delivered robust year-to-date gains of approximately 26%, significantly outperforming the broader market, driven by strong earnings momentum.
- FLS experienced a recent pullback following Q1 2026 earnings, with revenue declining 6.7% year-over-year despite EPS improvement.+stock+falls+on+Q1+2026+Earnings)
- Analyst consensus targets suggest modest upside for both, with CMI at around $600-650 from current levels near $640, and FLS at $89-90 from $85.
- Both stocks operate in the industrial machinery sector but differ in focus: CMI on engines and power systems, FLS on pumps and flow control.
- CMI shows stronger 12-month returns of over 120% compared to FLS's more moderate gains.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight trending bots with win rates up to 88% and returns exceeding 160% annualized, offering strategies across industrials.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CMI and FLS, two established players in the industrial machinery sector. Cummins Inc. specializes in engines and power generation, while Flowserve Corporation focuses on pumps, valves, and seals for fluid handling. Investors tracking industrial cyclicals, infrastructure growth, or energy transition themes may find value in assessing their relative performance, sector exposure, and market positioning amid recent volatility. This analysis highlights key metrics and trends to inform stock comparison decisions.
CMI Overview and Recent Performance
Cummins Inc. (CMI) is a global leader in power solutions, designing, manufacturing, and servicing diesel and natural gas engines, generators, and related technologies for transportation, industrial, and energy markets. In recent market activity, CMI shares have traded near $640-$660, reflecting strong upward momentum with year-to-date gains around 26% and over 120% returns in the past 12 months. Sentiment has been bolstered by robust Q4 2025 earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profitability per share) of $5.81, exceeding expectations, and anticipation for Q1 2026 results. Broader factors like data center power demand and infrastructure investments have supported performance, though shares show some consolidation in recent weeks.
FLS Overview and Recent Performance
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) provides engineered flow control products, including pumps, valves, and seals, serving industries like oil & gas, chemicals, and power generation. Shares have hovered around $85 in recent trading, following a 7.7% pre-earnings jump but a subsequent decline after Q1 2026 results showed revenue of $1.07 billion, down 6.7% year-over-year, offset by EPS of $0.64.+stock+falls+on+Q1+2026+Earnings) Market sentiment reflects caution on weaker bookings in original equipment sales, though aftermarket services provided resilience. Recent weeks have seen volatility tied to earnings reactions and tariff-related refunds, with shares underperforming broader indices.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ AI and machine learning for real-time signals, featuring win rates from 51% to 88%, annualized returns up to +163.65%, profit factors of 1.49 to 11.70, and trade durations from minutes to 50 days. Highlighted themes include semiconductors, industrials like FIX and SIJ (+90.57% annualized), data centers, and space stocks, with risk management via take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors such as 3% TP/2% SL. Suited to current volatility, they offer styles from trend trading to high-frequency plays. Explore these bots to align with your trading timeframe and risk profile.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CMI and FLS both benefit from industrial sector tailwinds like infrastructure spending but diverge in business models: CMI leverages engines for on-highway and power gen growth, while FLS emphasizes aftermarket services in fluid handling amid energy transitions. Recent momentum favors CMI with superior relative performance, versus FLS's earnings miss on revenue. Risk factors include cyclical exposure for both, with FLS more sensitive to oil prices and CMI to emissions regulations. Market sentiment tilts positive for CMI ahead of earnings, while FLS analysts note infrastructure upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CMI based on stronger trend consistency, elevated relative performance, and positive catalysts like upcoming earnings projections. FLS offers value in a recovery but trails in momentum. This probabilistic edge reflects observable data rather than guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMI is a Hold and FLS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMI (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +4.40% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
FLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-0.42% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CMI | FLS | CMI / FLS | |
| Capitalization | 97.2B | 8.86B | 1,097% |
| EBITDA | 5.23B | 710M | 736% |
| Gain YTD | 38.491 | 0.375 | 10,262% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.60 | 25.53 | 143% |
| Revenue | 33.9B | 4.65B | 729% |
| Total Cash | 3.18B | 792M | 402% |
| Total Debt | 8.24B | 1.89B | 436% |
CMI | FLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLS's Valuation (63) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CMI (75) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to CMI’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (38) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's SMR Rating (42) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (52) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (61) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (41) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMI | FLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 17 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CVSB | 50.68 | N/A | +0.01% |
| Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | |||
| MUNX | 25.03 | N/A | N/A |
| AMG GW&K Muni Income ETF | |||
| BSJQ | 23.18 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2026 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| CAIE | 27.37 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Calamos US Eq Autocallable Income ETF | |||
| ILIT | 22.45 | -0.38 | -1.67% |
| iShares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | |||
CMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMI has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMI jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
FLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| FELE - FLS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| ATMU - FLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| ITT - FLS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| LECO - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| KMT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
More | ||||