Advertisement
CMS vs FTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs. Fortis Inc. (FTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CMS and FTS deliver dividend yields near 3% (CMS at 3.00%, FTS at 3.23%), attracting income-oriented investors in volatile markets.
- FTS edges out with stronger year-to-date (YTD) gains of 10.71% versus CMS's 9.54%.
- CMS reported robust Q1 2026 earnings per share (EPS) of $1.13, beating estimates and reaffirming full-year guidance.
- FTS garners upbeat analyst sentiment ahead of its Q1 results, with recent price target increases.
- Low betas (CMS 0.37, FTS 0.44) highlight their defensive profiles in the utilities sector.
- FTS boasts a larger market cap ($29.1B) compared to CMS ($23.5B), reflecting broader scale.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits CMS Energy Corporation against Fortis Inc. (FTS), two prominent regulated utility providers in the electric and gas sectors. As defensive plays amid economic uncertainty and interest rate fluctuations, they appeal to dividend-seeking investors and traders eyeing relative performance in the utilities space. Recent market activity, including earnings reports and analyst updates, underscores shifts in sentiment and momentum, offering insights into their positioning for income stability and growth potential in a rate-sensitive environment.
CMS Overview and Recent Performance
CMS Energy Corporation operates as an energy utility primarily in Michigan, delivering electricity and natural gas through its subsidiary Consumers Energy. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $76, near the upper end of its 52-week range ($67.71–$80.36), reflecting YTD gains of about 9.54%. A key driver was the Q1 2026 earnings release, where adjusted EPS hit $1.13, surpassing expectations of $1.11, alongside reaffirmed full-year guidance. This bolstered sentiment despite a recent pullback tied to mixed price-to-earnings (P/E) signals around 21. With a beta of 0.37 and dividend yield of 3.00%, CMS maintains appeal as a stable, low-volatility option influenced by regulatory approvals and demand trends.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc. (FTS) stands as one of North America's largest investor-owned utilities, with regulated electric and gas operations spanning Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean. The stock hovers near $57, close to its 52-week high ($45.87–$58.78), supported by YTD returns of 10.71%. Anticipation builds for upcoming Q1 2026 results, fueled by analyst upgrades like CIBC's price target hike to C$81 and Barclays' Overweight initiation at $62. Trading at a P/E of about 23 with a 3.23% yield and beta of 0.44, FTS benefits from geographic diversification and steady rate base growth, though sensitive to interest rates given its debt profile.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page spotlights 25 elite performers curated from 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles—from short-term signals to long-term positions. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +163%, win rates spanning 51%–88%, profit factors to 11.70, and trade durations from 1 day to 49 days, often trading 1–18 tickers in sectors like semiconductors, ETFs, and industrials. Tailored for current conditions, they offer real-time signals for copy trading via Signal, Virtual, or Brokerage Agents. Explore these top bots to enhance your strategy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CMS and FTS thrive on regulated utility models, generating stable cash flows via rate-approved returns on equity. CMS concentrates on Michigan's integrated electric-gas operations, exposing it to regional weather and industrial demand, while FTS leverages multi-jurisdictional scale for smoother growth. Recent momentum favors FTS with superior YTD returns and analyst momentum; CMS shows earnings strength but valuation pressures. Risks include interest rate hikes impacting high debt loads (CMS debt/equity 190%, FTS 134%) and regulatory hurdles. Sector-wise, both gain from electrification trends, though FTS's diversification tempers U.S.-centric volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI leans toward FTS in the current environment, citing its edge in YTD performance, slightly higher yield, and building analyst catalysts ahead of earnings. While CMS offers proven earnings stability, FTS's broader footprint and relative strength position it favorably for trend consistency amid utility sector rotation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- FTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.83% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | FTS | CMS / FTS | |
| Capitalization | 22.1B | 28B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 3.4B | 5.91B | 58% |
| Gain YTD | 4.014 | 5.333 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.82 | 22.12 | 90% |
| Revenue | 8.82B | 12.2B | 72% |
| Total Cash | 175M | 359M | 49% |
| Total Debt | 19.1B | 35.4B | 54% |
CMS | FTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTS's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CMS (64) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (62) in the null industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CMS (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CMS (54) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | FTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 39% | 13 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RBIL | 50.35 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| F/m Ultrshrt Trs Infl-Protd Sec TIPS ETF | |||
| DVXY | 22.00 | N/A | N/A |
| WEBs Consumer Disc XLY Dfnd Vol ETF | |||
| FXA | 70.79 | -0.70 | -0.98% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
| GVUS | 59.61 | -0.76 | -1.26% |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF | |||
| NVG | 12.37 | -0.17 | -1.36% |
| Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund | |||
CMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
FTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then ED could also see price increases.