Advertisement
COHU vs NVTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cohu, Inc. (COHU) vs. Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- COHU shares have surged over 100% YTD, driven by AI-related high-performance computing (HPC) test demand and Q1 revenue of $125M, outperforming broader market benchmarks.
- NVTS boasts even stronger YTD gains near 146% and 1-year returns exceeding 700%, fueled by GaN/SiC power semis for AI data centers, though from a smaller revenue base of $8.6M in Q1.
- Both semiconductor firms benefit from AI tailwinds, but COHU shows profitability progress with positive Q1 EPS while NVTS remains loss-making despite revenue beats.
- Analyst targets imply upside for COHU (avg. $57) over NVTS (avg. $11), reflecting COHU's scale and order momentum like $30M HPC follow-ons.
- NVTS offers higher growth potential in power efficiency but carries elevated volatility and execution risks versus COHU's established test equipment position.
- Market sentiment favors both amid semiconductor recovery, with relative performance highlighting trade-offs in momentum versus stability.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines COHU and NVTS, two semiconductor players capitalizing on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure demand. COHU, a leader in test and inspection equipment, supports chip validation for high-performance computing. NVTS specializes in next-generation gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC) power semiconductors for efficient data center power delivery. Traders seeking exposure to AI-driven growth in semis, and investors evaluating relative performance in volatile markets, will find value in contrasting their business models, recent momentum, and positioning. Both have delivered outsized returns amid sector tailwinds, offering insights into growth versus stability trade-offs.
COHU Overview and Recent Performance
Cohu, Inc. (COHU) provides semiconductor test handlers, automated test equipment (ATE), interface products, and data analytics software to optimize manufacturing yield. Headquartered in San Diego, the company serves global chipmakers and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) providers, with a focus on back-end processes for AI and high-performance computing chips.
In recent market activity, COHU shares have exhibited strong upward momentum, posting over 100% year-to-date (YTD) gains and nearly 200% over one year, significantly outpacing the S&P 500. This performance stems from heightened demand for testing solutions tied to AI datacenter expansions. First-quarter 2026 results showed revenue of $125.1 million, up 29% year-over-year, with gross margins near 46% and positive GAAP EPS of $0.01. Key catalysts include $30 million in follow-on orders for the Eclipse high-performance computing test platform and analyst upgrades lifting average price targets to $57. Sentiment has improved on raised full-year HPC revenue outlook to $80-100 million, though profitability remains pressured by operating expenses amid cyclical semis exposure.
NVTS Overview and Recent Performance
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) designs and markets GaNFast gallium nitride (GaN) power ICs and GeneSiC silicon carbide (SiC) devices, enabling superior efficiency in power conversion for AI data centers, electric vehicles (EVs), and industrial applications. As a pure-play next-generation power semis firm founded in 2014, it targets high-growth markets replacing traditional silicon with wide-bandgap technologies.
Recent weeks have seen NVTS deliver explosive gains, with YTD returns around 146% and over 700% in one year, reflecting investor enthusiasm for its AI power solutions pivot. Q1 2026 revenue reached $8.6 million, up 18% sequentially and beating estimates, driven by mid-30% growth in high-power segments like data centers. Non-GAAP gross margins expanded to 39%, signaling mix shift toward premium products. However, GAAP losses persisted at $0.04 per share (beating consensus -$0.05), with ongoing investments in R&D and operations. Board additions like independent director Davin Lee bolster governance, while Q2 guidance of $10 million revenue supports turnaround narrative. Volatility remains high due to smaller scale and execution risks in competitive power markets.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 agents, scanning thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ advanced machine learning for real-time signal generation, focusing on momentum, sector rotation, and volatility in high-growth areas like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and leveraged plays. Only the most suitable for current conditions—boasting annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors exceeding 11—earn a spot in this dynamic leaderboard of 25 elite performers. Strategies vary from short-term (15-minute) scalps on semis like NVDA to multi-day holds in industrials, with risk controls like 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors. Explore these bots to potentially outperform benchmarks; copy trading via Tickeron’s brokerage offers seamless access for diversified portfolios.
Head-to-Head Comparison
COHU and NVTS both ride AI semis wave but diverge in focus: COHU's equipment model (~$480M TTM revenue) enables testing for complex chips, while NVTS's (~$40M TTM) power ICs optimize energy use in servers/EVs. Growth drivers contrast scale-driven HPC orders for COHU versus high-power adoption for NVTS. Recent momentum favors NVTS's triple-digit YTD surge over COHU's strong but steadier climb, though COHU edges on stability with positive EPS path.
Risk factors include NVTS's persistent losses and revenue volatility versus COHU's cyclical equipment demand and debt. Sector exposure overlaps in AI datacenters—testing for COHU, power for NVTS—but COHU diversifies via OSATs. Market sentiment tilts toward COHU's analyst upgrades amid NVTS's beta-driven swings, highlighting trade-offs in proven revenue versus explosive potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors COHU due to its trend consistency in recent market activity, larger revenue scale, emerging profitability, and concrete catalysts like HPC orders and raised outlooks. While NVTS shows superior short-term momentum from power semis traction, COHU's relative stability and positioning in the semiconductor test chain offer a probabilistic edge amid AI buildouts, though both face sector volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHU is a Hold and NVTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COHU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COHU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COHU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COHU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COHU (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -4.84% price change this week, while NVTS (@Semiconductors) price change was +17.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
COHU is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
NVTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| COHU | NVTS | COHU / NVTS | |
| Capitalization | 2.22B | 4.98B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 6.05M | -70.64M | -9% |
| Gain YTD | 102.578 | 198.599 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.42 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 481M | 40.5M | 1,188% |
| Total Cash | 489M | 221M | 221% |
| Total Debt | 327M | 6.34M | 5,159% |
COHU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COHU | NVTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JIGCX | 62.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Overseas C | |||
| RCEEX | 80.61 | -0.95 | -1.16% |
| American Funds Capital Income Bldr R2E | |||
| GPGCX | 17.37 | -0.29 | -1.64% |
| Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Instl | |||
| SLLAX | 14.16 | -0.29 | -2.01% |
| SEI Small Cap F (SIMT) | |||
| IYITX | 23.04 | -0.70 | -2.95% |
| Nomura International Core Equity R | |||
COHU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COHU has been closely correlated with DIOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COHU jumps, then DIOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COHU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHU | 100% | -3.72% | ||
| DIOD - COHU | 73% Closely correlated | -3.48% | ||
| POWI - COHU | 70% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| NXPI - COHU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| UCTT - COHU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| SLAB - COHU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||
NVTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVTS | 100% | -4.48% | ||
| IFNNY - NVTS | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| TOELY - NVTS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| PENG - NVTS | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.30% | ||
| AAOI - NVTS | 42% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| COHU - NVTS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
More | ||||