Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRVL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRVL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRVL (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -0.47% price change this week, while MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -1.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.78%.
CRVL is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2024.
MMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2024.
Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
CRVL | MMC | CRVL / MMC | |
Capitalization | 4.5B | 101B | 4% |
EBITDA | 121M | 6.32B | 2% |
Gain YTD | -6.031 | 4.675 | -129% |
P/E Ratio | 59.55 | 27.08 | 220% |
Revenue | 774M | 22.7B | 3% |
Total Cash | 107M | 3.36B | 3% |
Total Debt | 32.4M | 15.4B | 0% |
CRVL | MMC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMC's Valuation (87) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as CRVL (94). This means that MMC’s stock grew similarly to CRVL’s over the last 12 months.
MMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as CRVL (10). This means that MMC’s stock grew similarly to CRVL’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's SMR Rating (27) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MMC (30). This means that CRVL’s stock grew similarly to MMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MMC (55). This means that CRVL’s stock grew similarly to MMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MMC (64). This means that CRVL’s stock grew similarly to MMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL | MMC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago37% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago43% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago44% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago78% | 22 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 3 days ago41% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago49% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRVL and EHTH have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRVL and EHTH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRVL | 100% | -1.35% | ||
EHTH - CRVL | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
BRO - CRVL | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
ERIE - CRVL | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
BRP - CRVL | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.90% | ||
SLQT - CRVL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AON could also see price increases.