CRWD
Price
$365.96
Change
-$28.72 (-7.28%)
Updated
Apr 10, 12:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.1B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSFT
Price
$372.58
Change
-$0.49 (-0.13%)
Updated
Apr 10, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.77T
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWD vs MSFT

Header iconCRWD vs MSFT Comparison
Open Charts CRWD vs MSFTBanner chart's image
CRWD vs MSFT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. Microsoft (MSFT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CRWD and MSFT have faced downward pressure in recent market activity, with year-to-date declines around 16-23% amid broader tech sector volatility.
  • CRWD, a cybersecurity specialist, reported strong Q4 FY2026 results with 23% revenue growth to $1.31 billion and ARR of $5.25 billion, but shares dipped on AI disruption concerns.
  • MSFT delivered Q2 FY2026 revenue of $81.3 billion (up 17%), driven by Azure cloud growth at 39%, though stock pulled back on moderating AI momentum.
  • CRWD exhibits higher volatility (beta 1.07) compared to MSFT (beta 1.11), reflecting its pure-play cybersecurity focus versus Microsoft's diversified tech portfolio.
  • Recent sentiment shifts for both stem from AI-related news, including partnerships and competition fears, influencing short-term price behavior.
  • Tickeron's AI tools highlight relative performance trends, aiding traders in navigating these stocks' market positioning.

Introduction

This stock comparison between CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings) and MSFT (Microsoft) examines two tech leaders amid evolving AI and cybersecurity landscapes. CrowdStrike specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection, while Microsoft offers a broad ecosystem spanning cloud computing, software, and AI services. Traders seeking growth in cybersecurity or diversified tech exposure, and investors tracking relative performance in volatile markets, will find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and sector dynamics. This analysis draws on verifiable data to highlight contrasts in stock behavior and market sentiment.

CRWD Overview and Recent Performance

CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) provides AI-powered cybersecurity platforms, focusing on endpoint detection, threat intelligence, and incident response via its Falcon platform. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced volatility, trading around $365-$395 with a 52-week range of $343-$567 and market cap near $93 billion. Year-to-date, shares are down approximately 16%, underperforming amid tech sell-offs. Q4 FY2026 results showed revenue up 23% to $1.31 billion, with annual recurring revenue (ARR, a key subscription metric) reaching $5.25 billion, up 24%, and record net new ARR of $331 million. A $500 million share buyback expansion supported sentiment, but concerns over AI tools from rivals like Anthropic triggered recent declines of 7-11% in single sessions. Partnerships enhancing AI defenses have bolstered long-term positioning, though short-term sentiment reflects broader cybersecurity sector pressures.

MSFT Overview and Recent Performance

Microsoft (MSFT) is a diversified technology giant with core segments in productivity software, intelligent cloud (including Azure), and personal computing. Recently, shares have hovered near $373, within a 52-week range of $356-$555 and a massive $2.77 trillion market cap. Year-to-date performance shows a roughly 23% decline, aligned with tech sector headwinds. Q2 FY2026 revenue grew 17% to $81.3 billion, powered by Azure's 39% expansion and Microsoft Cloud surpassing $50 billion, up 26%. Operating income rose 21% to $38.3 billion. However, moderating cloud growth guidance and AI competition fears contributed to pullbacks, including multi-percent drops in recent weeks. Investments in AI infrastructure, like $10 billion in Japan for AI and cyber defense, underscore sustained catalysts, balancing near-term volatility with enterprise demand stability.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their suitability in current market conditions. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies like trend tracking, hedging, and volatility exploitation over timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days. Performance metrics stand out: annualized returns range from +16% to +151%, win rates 53%-87%, profit factors 1.45-11.45, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 21.35. Focused on high-growth sectors such as semiconductors and AI infrastructure, they offer transparent, real-time signals via Signal, Virtual, and Brokerage Agents. Traders can explore these tools to enhance strategies matching their risk profiles and market views—visit the page for live rankings and detailed stats.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CRWD and MSFT operate in overlapping tech domains but diverge sharply in scale and focus. CrowdStrike's pure-play cybersecurity model drives higher growth—23% revenue pace versus Microsoft's 17%—fueled by rising threats and AI integration, yet exposes it to sector-specific risks like AI disruption fears. Microsoft’s diversified revenue, with Azure as a growth engine (39% YoY), provides stability (PE ratio 23.37 TTM) and lower relative volatility, though recent cloud slowdowns highlight trade-offs in maturity. Momentum favors CRWD's ARR acceleration over Microsoft's broader but moderating cloud trends. Risk profiles contrast: CRWD carries elevated beta and negative EPS (-0.63 TTM), while MSFT boasts positive EPS (15.97 TTM) and dividends. Market sentiment tilts toward Microsoft's ecosystem resilience amid AI hype, but CRWD gains from cybersecurity tailwinds.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MSFT for its trend consistency, diversified stability, and Azure catalysts positioning it favorably in AI-cloud convergence. While CRWD shows superior growth metrics like ARR expansion, its higher volatility and recent AI-related dips suggest elevated near-term risks. Probabilistic edge favors Microsoft’s relative positioning, though both merit monitoring for sentiment shifts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CRWD vs. MSFT commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Hold and MSFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CRWD: $394.68 vs. MSFT: $373.07)
Brand notoriety: CRWD and MSFT are both notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWD: 193% vs. MSFT: 115%
Market capitalization -- CRWD: $100.1B vs. MSFT: $2.77T
CRWD [@Computer Communications] is valued at $100.1B. MSFT’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.77T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.77T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $19.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSFT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSFT is a better buy in the long-term than CRWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSFT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MSFT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSFT is a better buy in the short-term than CRWD.

Price Growth

CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while MSFT (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWD is expected to report earnings on Jun 09, 2026.

MSFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.93% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSFT($2.77T) has a higher market cap than CRWD($100B). CRWD has higher P/E ratio than MSFT: CRWD (765.02) vs MSFT (23.35). CRWD YTD gains are higher at: -15.803 vs. MSFT (-22.683). MSFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 188B vs. CRWD (182M). MSFT has more cash in the bank: 89.5B vs. CRWD (5.23B). CRWD has less debt than MSFT: CRWD (820M) vs MSFT (57.6B). MSFT has higher revenues than CRWD: MSFT (305B) vs CRWD (4.81B).
CRWDMSFTCRWD / MSFT
Capitalization100B2.77T4%
EBITDA182M188B0%
Gain YTD-15.803-22.68370%
P/E Ratio765.0223.353,277%
Revenue4.81B305B2%
Total Cash5.23B89.5B6%
Total Debt820M57.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWD vs MSFT: Fundamental Ratings
CRWD
MSFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1753
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5055
SMR RATING
1..100
9027
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7583
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSFT's Valuation (29) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (96) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MSFT (55) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's SMR Rating (27) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (90) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MSFT (64) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MSFT (83) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWDMSFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCL17.170.38
+2.26%
T-Rex 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
ICX.X0.0367720.000179
+0.49%
ICON cryptocurrency
MARB20.820.06
+0.29%
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
EVSB50.810.02
+0.04%
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
OP.X0.113993-0.000963
-0.84%
Optimism cryptocurrency