Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBGX
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBGX
Calvert Balanced C
Price$44.04
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$36.86
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.03B
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. CSGCX (1.42B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBGX (2.15) vs CSGCX (0.66). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: CSGCX (31 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). CSGCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBGX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. CSGCX (3.97). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.13 vs. CSGCX (32.45).
| CSGCX | RLBGX | CSGCX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.884 | 8.142 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 2.15 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.97 | 7.17 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.94 | 37.30 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.45 | 42.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.76 | 66.20 | 62% |