In the competitive electronic components industry, CTS Corporation and Vicor Corporation (VICR) stand out for their roles in sensors, actuators, and modular power systems. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers amid rising demand in aerospace, defense, industrial, and emerging AI infrastructure sectors. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye VICR's surge, while investors favoring stability might prefer CTS's diversified exposure. Understanding their relative performance helps in navigating current market dynamics.
CTS Corporation designs, manufactures, and sells sensors, connectivity components, and actuators primarily for transportation, industrial, medical, aerospace, and defense markets. In recent market activity, the stock has delivered a YTD return of 35.57% and 49.37% over one year, outperforming the S&P 500's benchmarks. Q1 2026 results showed sales of $139 million, up 11% year-over-year, driven by 18% growth in diversified end-markets like medical (up 28%) and a 3% rise in transportation. Adjusted gross margin expanded 250 basis points to 39.5%, boosting adjusted diluted EPS to $0.62 from $0.44. Net income reached $17 million, with operating cash flow at $17.3 million supporting share repurchases. A book-to-bill ratio of 1.1 reflects balanced demand, while narrowed 2026 guidance ($560M-$580M sales, $2.35-$2.45 adjusted EPS) underscores confidence. Sentiment has been positive post-earnings, with analysts like Argus maintaining Buy ratings and targets around $61, influenced by margin gains and diversification strategy.
Vicor Corporation (VICR) develops and markets modular power components and systems for mission-critical applications in computing, industrial, aerospace, defense, and beyond. Recent weeks have seen explosive momentum, with YTD returns at 142.71% and one-year gains of 557.94%, far exceeding broader indices. Q1 2026 revenue climbed 20.2% to $113 million, with Advanced Products at $64.9 million and Brick Products up 40.9% year-over-year. Gross margin improved to 55.2%, driving net income to $20.7 million and diluted EPS of $0.44. Backlog ballooned 70% sequentially to $301 million, with book-to-bill over 2:1, fueled by AI infrastructure and defense demand. The company guided Q2 revenue near $126 million and full-year around $570 million. Stock surged 19.5%-25% post-earnings on backlog expansion and profitability. Analysts maintain Buy ratings, with targets up to $325, though high beta (2.34) highlights volatility risks in this market positioning.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots are highlighted by AI analysis for their suitability in current market conditions, showcasing annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51%-88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Strategies vary by timeframe (e.g., 15-60 minutes), style (momentum, trend, fundamental analysis), and sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA/AVGO up +72%, 60% win rate), industrials, AI infrastructure, space, and volatility plays. High performers include multi-ticker agents for USAR/SMR/CIFR (+169%) and leveraged ETFs like GGLL (+134%). Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge in dynamic environments.
Both firms share electronic components exposure but diverge in business models: CTS emphasizes diversified sensors/actuators across stable end-markets, while VICR focuses on high-density modular power for growth areas like AI servers and defense. Growth drivers contrast—CTS benefits from industrial/medical resilience (18% diversified growth), VICR from AI-fueled backlog explosion. Recent momentum favors VICR (142% YTD vs. 36%), but CTS offers lower risk with steady margins and cash flow. Sector overlaps in aerospace/defense expose both to supply chain factors, yet VICR's higher P/E (83x) signals premium valuation versus CTS's stability. Market sentiment leans bullish on VICR's catalysts, trading off against CTS's balanced profile.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor VICR due to superior trend consistency, massive backlog growth as a key catalyst, and stronger relative positioning in high-growth AI/defense segments. While CTS exhibits stability and earnings beats, VICR's momentum suggests higher probabilistic upside in the near term, albeit with elevated volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVICR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VICR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +8.77% price change this week, while VICR (@Electronic Components) price change was +24.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.19%.
CTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
VICR is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| CTS | VICR | CTS / VICR | |
| Capitalization | 1.76B | 14.3B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 120M | 107% |
| Gain YTD | 43.552 | 185.547 | 23% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.28 | 104.67 | 25% |
| Revenue | 555M | 472M | 118% |
| Total Cash | 90.9M | 404M | 23% |
| Total Debt | 95M | 7.15M | 1,329% |
CTS | VICR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTS's Valuation (54) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as VICR (82). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to VICR’s over the last 12 months.
VICR's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (40). This means that VICR’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
VICR's SMR Rating (45) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (62). This means that VICR’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
VICR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (40). This means that VICR’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
VICR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (29). This means that VICR’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
| CTS | VICR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| BHE - CTS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| KN - CTS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| LFUS - CTS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| ROG - CTS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| PLXS - CTS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VICR has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VICR jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VICR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VICR | 100% | +22.03% | ||
| BHE - VICR | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| PLXS - VICR | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| TTMI - VICR | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.66% | ||
| KN - VICR | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| JBL - VICR | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
More | ||||