Compare predictions CULP vs DXYN
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CULP is a Buy and DXYN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CULP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDXYN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CULP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DXYN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CULP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DXYN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CULP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- DXYN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CULP (@Textiles) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while DXYN (@Textiles) price change was -5.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
CULP is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2024.
DXYN is expected to report earnings on May 03, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Textiles (-2.06% weekly)The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
| CULP | DXYN | CULP / DXYN | |
| Capitalization | 59.9M | 8.08M | 742% |
| EBITDA | -4.97M | 12.8M | -39% |
| Gain YTD | -22.971 | -30.504 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.29 | 12.72 | 97% |
| Revenue | 237M | 276M | 86% |
| Total Cash | 13.5M | 79K | 17,089% |
| Total Debt | 5.18M | 112M | 5% |
CULP | DXYN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CULP's Valuation (38) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as DXYN (62) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that CULP’s stock grew similarly to DXYN’s over the last 12 months.
CULP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as DXYN (100) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that CULP’s stock grew similarly to DXYN’s over the last 12 months.
DXYN's SMR Rating (93) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as CULP (94) in the Textiles industry. This means that DXYN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
CULP's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as DXYN (81) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that CULP’s stock grew similarly to DXYN’s over the last 12 months.
DXYN's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as CULP (97) in the Textiles industry. This means that DXYN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
| CULP | DXYN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 23 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
CULP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CULP and AIN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULP and AIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CULP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULP | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| AIN - CULP | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| WQTEF - CULP | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UFI - CULP | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| DXYN - CULP | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.05% |
DXYN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DXYN and AIN have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DXYN and AIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DXYN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DXYN | 100% | -3.05% | ||
| AIN - DXYN | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| CULP - DXYN | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| UFI - DXYN | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| WQTEF - DXYN | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A |