CWAN
Price
$23.85
Change
+$0.37 (+1.58%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.99B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$232.58
Change
+$9.09 (+4.07%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.18B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWAN vs HUBS

Header iconCWAN vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts CWAN vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Clearwater Analytics Holdings
Price$23.85
Change+$0.37 (+1.58%)
Volume$10.26M
Capitalization6.99B
HUBSPOT
Price$232.58
Change+$9.09 (+4.07%)
Volume$2.28M
Capitalization12.18B
CWAN vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
CWAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWAN vs. HUBS commentary
Feb 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWAN is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CWAN: $23.85 vs. HUBS: $232.58)
Brand notoriety: CWAN and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWAN: 70% vs. HUBS: 202%
Market capitalization -- CWAN: $6.99B vs. HUBS: $12.18B
CWAN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.99B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $12.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $234.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $6.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWAN is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWAN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWAN is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

CWAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -16.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-5.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($12.2B) has a higher market cap than CWAN($6.99B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CWAN: HUBS (7023.44) vs CWAN (15.29). CWAN YTD gains are higher at: -1.119 vs. HUBS (-42.043). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. CWAN (64.2M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. CWAN (64.1M). HUBS has less debt than CWAN: HUBS (272M) vs CWAN (883M). HUBS has higher revenues than CWAN: HUBS (2.99B) vs CWAN (640M).
CWANHUBSCWAN / HUBS
Capitalization6.99B12.2B57%
EBITDA64.2M149M43%
Gain YTD-1.119-42.0433%
P/E Ratio15.297023.440%
Revenue640M2.99B21%
Total Cash64.1M1.49B4%
Total Debt883M272M325%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWANHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XYZG10.490.86
+8.98%
Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF
BFAP15.660.46
+3.00%
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April
BETZ18.160.18
+1.00%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
SEPW32.160.25
+0.79%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF
MEAR50.47-0.02
-0.04%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF

CWAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWAN has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWAN jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWAN
1D Price
Change %
CWAN100%
+1.58%
ACIW - CWAN
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.98%
FRSH - CWAN
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
COIN - CWAN
46%
Loosely correlated
+13.00%
TEAM - CWAN
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.75%
CLSK - CWAN
46%
Loosely correlated
+21.96%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+4.07%
CRM - HUBS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
TEAM - HUBS
77%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
DT - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
NOW - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
KVYO - HUBS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More