CZOO vs HNST ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZOO is a Hold and HNST is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHNST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CZOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZOO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CZOO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CZOO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +50.33% price change this week, while HNST (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
CZOO is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2023.
HNST is expected to report earnings on Aug 09, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+2.27% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Household/Personal Care (+0.88% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CZOO | HNST | CZOO / HNST | |
| Capitalization | 58.7M | 388M | 15% |
| EBITDA | -150.14M | -36.15M | 415% |
| Gain YTD | -5.053 | -5.758 | 88% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.08B | 344M | 315% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 32.8M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 29.8M | - |
| CZOO | HNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | about 1 month ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTMSX | 23.57 | 0.51 | +2.21% |
| FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl | |||
| HFMVX | 35.05 | 0.65 | +1.89% |
| Hartford MidCap R6 | |||
| MXGSX | 11.20 | 0.19 | +1.73% |
| Empower Large Cap Growth Instl | |||
| NILTX | 13.22 | 0.16 | +1.23% |
| Neuberger Berman International Sel Tr | |||
| UIPMX | 18.33 | 0.11 | +0.60% |
| Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl | |||
CZOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZOO and ALLG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZOO and ALLG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZOO | 100% | +80.76% | ||
| ALLG - CZOO | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
| CHPT - CZOO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
| GME - CZOO | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| RH - CZOO | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| HNST - CZOO | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.98% | ||
More | ||||
HNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNST has been loosely correlated with GRWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNST jumps, then GRWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNST | 100% | +2.98% | ||
| GRWG - HNST | 56% Loosely correlated | +8.85% | ||
| RH - HNST | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| FND - HNST | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CHPT - HNST | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| LESL - HNST | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
More | ||||