DocuSign (DOCU) and Klaviyo (KVYO) represent key players in the software-as-a-service (SaaS) sector, with DOCU leading in electronic signatures and agreement management, and KVYO specializing in AI-enhanced customer relationship management (CRM) for e-commerce. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid volatile tech conditions. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye KVYO's growth trajectory, while value-oriented investors could prefer DOCU's profitability. Understanding relative performance aids in portfolio diversification within SaaS and martech spaces.
DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) provides an AI-powered intelligent agreement management platform, including e-signature solutions, contract lifecycle management (CLM), and document generation tools. Serving enterprises globally, it emphasizes compliance features like FedRAMP authorization for U.S. federal use.
In recent market activity, DOCU shares have traded around $48, within a 52-week range of $40-95, reflecting YTD gains of 29% and 41% over one year. The stock exhibits stability with a beta of 0.88, underperforming broader indices in some sessions but buoyed by takeover speculation and expansions into intelligent agreements. Financials show TTM revenue of $3.22 billion (up 7.8% quarterly YoY), profit margin of 9.6%, and EPS of $1.48. Upcoming earnings project EPS of $1.00 on $825 million revenue, influencing cautious sentiment amid analyst downgrades like Citigroup's Neutral rating at $50 target.
Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) delivers a cloud-based B2C CRM platform integrating marketing automation, analytics, and AI tools like Marketing Agent for campaign execution. Targeted at e-commerce brands, it unifies data via Klaviyo Data Platform (KDP) and supports channels including email, SMS, and social.
Recent weeks saw KVYO volatility, with shares dropping 32% intraday to ~$16 (52-week $15-38), despite YTD return of ~52% and one-year 50%. Beta of 0.79 indicates lower market sensitivity, but high volume post-Q1 earnings highlighted risks. Q1 2026 revenue hit $358 million (28% YoY growth, beating estimates), with raised FY26 guidance to $1.51-1.52 billion and record non-GAAP operating margin of 16%. TTM revenue stands at $1.23 billion (29.6% quarterly growth), though profitability lags at -2.6% margin and EPS -$0.11. Analyst consensus remains Buy with $31 average target, tempered by price target cuts on guidance deceleration.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only 25 bots out of 351 total earn a spot here, based on AI analysis of real-time performance in volatile environments like semiconductors and industrials. Featured bots boast impressive stats: annualized returns up to +169% (e.g., USAR/SMR/CIFR strategy), win rates of 60-75%, and profit factors of 2.0-3.2, with some achieving 70-80% success over short durations. These virtual, signal, and brokerage agents adapt via momentum, sector rotation, and financial learning models. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to current trends in SaaS or broader tech for enhanced trading edge.
DOCU and KVYO both thrive in SaaS but diverge in business models: DOCU's mature e-signature focus yields steady enterprise revenue ($3.2B TTM), while KVYO's e-commerce CRM leverages AI for faster 29% growth on $1.2B base. Growth drivers contrast—DOCU via CLM expansions, KVYO through data unification and agents—exposing KVYO to e-commerce cyclicality.
Recent momentum favors neither decisively: DOCU's stability (lower beta, positive EPS) vs. KVYO's post-earnings plunge despite beats. Risk factors include DOCU's takeover dependency and KVYO's losses (negative EBITDA -$54M). Sector exposure overlaps in tech but KVYO ties to retail volatility. Valuations show DOCU cheaper (forward P/E 10.7, P/S 3.2) than KVYO (27.1, 5.3), with sentiment mixed—DOCU Hold/Neutral, KVYO Moderate Buy—highlighting trade-offs in stability versus growth.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward DOCU due to superior trend consistency, profitability (9.6% margins vs. losses), attractive forward valuation, and lower volatility in recent market activity. While KVYO offers higher growth catalysts like 28% revenue acceleration and AI integrations, its sharp drawdowns signal elevated risk. Observable factors position DOCU with higher probability for near-term relative outperformance, though both warrant monitoring amid SaaS sector shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOCU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKVYO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOCU’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KVYO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DOCU (@Packaged Software) experienced а +7.76% price change this week, while KVYO (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.53%.
DOCU is expected to report earnings on Jun 04, 2026.
KVYO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DOCU | KVYO | DOCU / KVYO | |
| Capitalization | 9.6B | 4.4B | 218% |
| EBITDA | 466M | -22.11M | -2,108% |
| Gain YTD | -27.749 | -54.727 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.39 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.22B | 1.31B | 245% |
| Total Cash | 867M | 985M | 88% |
| Total Debt | 185M | 117M | 158% |
DOCU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DOCU | KVYO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOCU has been closely correlated with BRZE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOCU jumps, then BRZE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DOCU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOCU | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| BRZE - DOCU | 71% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| COIN - DOCU | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| CLSK - DOCU | 61% Loosely correlated | +9.30% | ||
| FRSH - DOCU | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| HUBS - DOCU | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KVYO has been loosely correlated with BRZE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KVYO jumps, then BRZE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KVYO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KVYO | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| BRZE - KVYO | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| TEAM - KVYO | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| NICE - KVYO | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| FRSH - KVYO | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| DOCU - KVYO | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||