EMN
Price
$96.36
Change
-$0.43 (-0.44%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
One day until earnings call
FUL
Price
$75.03
Change
-$1.07 (-1.41%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions EMN vs FUL

Header iconEMN vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts EMN vs FULBanner chart's image
Eastman Chemical
Price$96.36
Change-$0.43 (-0.44%)
Volume$263.65K
CapitalizationN/A
HB Fuller
Price$75.03
Change-$1.07 (-1.41%)
Volume$52.52K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EMN vs FUL Comparison Chart

Loading...

EMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FULDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
EMN vs. FUL commentary
Apr 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMN is a Hold and FUL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2024
Stock price -- (EMN: $96.80 vs. FUL: $76.11)
Brand notoriety: EMN and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMN: 64% vs. FUL: 95%
Market capitalization -- EMN: $11.8B vs. FUL: $4.35B
EMN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.8B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMN is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMN is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 19, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.17% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for EMN with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FUL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMN($11.8B) has a higher market cap than FUL($4.35B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than EMN: FUL (28.70) vs EMN (13.39). EMN YTD gains are higher at: 8.718 vs. FUL (-6.254). EMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.81B vs. FUL (540M). EMN has more cash in the bank: 548M vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than EMN: FUL (1.83B) vs EMN (4.85B). EMN has higher revenues than FUL: EMN (9.21B) vs FUL (3.51B).
EMNFULEMN / FUL
Capitalization11.8B4.35B272%
EBITDA1.81B540M335%
Gain YTD8.718-6.254-139%
P/E Ratio13.3928.7047%
Revenue9.21B3.51B262%
Total Cash548M165M332%
Total Debt4.85B1.83B265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMN vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
EMN
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4624
SMR RATING
1..100
5574
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5632
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (39) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as EMN (46) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's SMR Rating (55) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (74) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (52) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as EMN (56) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FULDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILDR21.340.50
+2.41%
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
CSB54.440.64
+1.18%
VictoryShares US SmCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF
LUXX25.020.23
+0.93%
Roundhill S&P Global Luxury ETF
FIDI20.690.15
+0.74%
Fidelity International High Div ETF
HDEF24.450.15
+0.62%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Div Yld Eq ETF

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then CE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
-0.27%
CE - EMN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
DOW - EMN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
WLK - EMN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
AVNT - EMN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
More