ENTG
Price
$133.07
Change
-$6.19 (-4.44%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
20.27B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$724.66
Change
-$51.35 (-6.62%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
817.22B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENTG vs MU

Header iconENTG vs MU Comparison
Open Charts ENTG vs MUBanner chart's image
ENTG vs MU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Entegris (ENTG) vs. Micron Technology (MU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both ENTG and MU have delivered strong year-to-date gains in the 70-120% range, fueled by semiconductor sector momentum tied to AI demand.
  • MU shows explosive revenue growth exceeding 190% year-over-year in recent quarters, outpacing ENTG's modest 5% rise, driven by high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for AI applications.
  • ENTG beat Q1 2026 earnings estimates with non-GAAP EPS of $0.86 versus $0.75 expected, highlighting margin expansion in materials solutions.
  • Semiconductor ETFs have seen record inflows, boosting sentiment for both stocks amid tight supply and AI infrastructure buildout.
  • MU trades at a forward P/E around 8-10x with higher profitability margins near 40-45%, contrasting ENTG's premium valuation.
  • Recent momentum favors MU with multi-week surges over 60%, though both face cyclical risks from chip demand fluctuations.

Introduction

Entegris (ENTG) and Micron Technology (MU) operate within the semiconductor ecosystem, where surging AI and high-performance computing demands have driven robust sector performance. ENTG supplies critical materials and purification solutions essential for chip fabrication, while MU manufactures memory chips like DRAM and NAND pivotal for data centers. This stock comparison suits traders eyeing relative performance in volatile tech markets and investors assessing exposure to AI tailwinds versus supply chain enablers. Recent market activity underscores contrasts in growth trajectories and risk profiles amid broader semiconductor inflows.

ENTG Overview and Recent Performance

Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) is a leading provider of advanced materials and process solutions for semiconductor manufacturing, operating through Materials Solutions (MS) and Advanced Purity Solutions (APS) segments. MS delivers specialty chemicals like chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) slurries, while APS focuses on filtration and purification to enhance yield and reliability.

In recent market activity, ENTG shares have surged over 70% year-to-date, reflecting heightened demand for advanced node technologies. Q1 2026 results showed net sales of $812 million, up 5% year-over-year, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.86 beating estimates by 15%. Gross margins expanded to 46.9%, supported by disciplined execution and AI-related wafer fab investments. Sentiment has improved on strong cash flow generation—$144 million in free cash flow—and deleveraging progress, though high debt from prior acquisitions tempers upside. Trading near 52-week highs around $149-159, the stock benefits from sector inflows but remains sensitive to capex cycles.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) designs and produces memory and storage solutions, including DRAM, NAND, and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) crucial for AI data centers and computing.

Recent weeks have seen MU explode higher, with shares up over 120% year-to-date and multi-day gains exceeding 10-20% amid AI hype. Q2 FY2026 revenue soared 196% to $23.9 billion, with non-GAAP EPS of $12.20 crushing estimates by 38%, propelled by HBM sellouts and tight DRAM/NAND supply. Gross margins hit 45-75% in segments, reflecting pricing power. Market sentiment rides booming hyperscaler spending and analyst upgrades to $660 targets, pushing market cap past $700 billion. Volatility persists with beta over 1.9, but relative strength versus the S&P 500—nearly 700% one-year outperformance—signals sustained momentum tied to AI infrastructure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 350 available, selected for superior performance in current market conditions. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies like trend following, multi-agent systems, and risk-managed corridors (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss). Performance highlights include annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with some achieving +94% in semiconductors including ENTG and MU. Timeframes range from 5-minute scalps to 48-day holds, catering to various styles. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ENTG’s materials-focused model supports the entire chip supply chain, offering stability through recurring demand for purification and slurries, while MU’s end-product memory fabrication captures direct AI upside via HBM but faces commoditization risks. Growth drivers diverge: MU leverages 196% revenue surges from data center memory tightness, versus ENTG’s steadier 5% tied to fab expansions.

Recent momentum tilts to MU with 60%+ monthly gains, outpacing ENTG’s 25-30%, though both ride semiconductor ETF inflows. Risk factors include ENTG’s elevated debt (targeting 3x net leverage) and margin pressures from capex, contrasted by MU’s higher beta (1.6-1.9) and cyclical inventory swings. Sector exposure is pure semis for both, but sentiment favors MU’s AI catalysts over ENTG’s enabler role, trading at lower forward multiples despite superior ROE (40%).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MU for its trend consistency in AI memory demand, higher revenue acceleration, and attractive forward valuation amid sold-out HBM capacity. ENTG offers stability via margins and cash flow, but MU’s relative positioning and catalysts like hyperscaler spending suggest greater near-term probability of outperformance in the semiconductor rally.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
ENTG vs. MU commentary
May 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENTG is a Hold and MU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2026
Stock price -- (ENTG: $133.07 vs. MU: $724.66)
Brand notoriety: ENTG: Not notable vs. MU: Notable
ENTG represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MU is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENTG: 122% vs. MU: 101%
Market capitalization -- ENTG: $20.27B vs. MU: $817.22B
ENTG [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $20.27B. MU’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $817.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $617.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $52.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $143.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENTG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ENTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than ENTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENTG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENTG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENTG is a better buy in the short-term than MU.

Price Growth

ENTG (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -10.76% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

ENTG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($817B) has a higher market cap than ENTG($20.3B). ENTG has higher P/E ratio than MU: ENTG (76.92) vs MU (34.20). MU YTD gains are higher at: 154.008 vs. ENTG (58.187). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.1B vs. ENTG (848M). MU has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. ENTG (443M). ENTG has less debt than MU: ENTG (3.76B) vs MU (10.8B). MU has higher revenues than ENTG: MU (58.1B) vs ENTG (3.24B).
ENTGMUENTG / MU
Capitalization20.3B817B2%
EBITDA848M37.1B2%
Gain YTD58.187154.00838%
P/E Ratio76.9234.20225%
Revenue3.24B58.1B6%
Total Cash443M14.6B3%
Total Debt3.76B10.8B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENTG vs MU: Fundamental Ratings
ENTG
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
804
SMR RATING
1..100
8023
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
422
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (63) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ENTG (72) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for ENTG (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew significantly faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (23) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

ENTG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MU (17) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ENTG’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENTGMU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBAT0.710.03
+4.40%
Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust (BAT)
ORCS24.930.30
+1.22%
Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF
FXY57.85-0.15
-0.26%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen
FLIN34.43-0.33
-0.95%
Franklin FTSE India ETF
STXD37.78-0.37
-0.98%
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF

ENTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENTG has been closely correlated with LSCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENTG jumps, then LSCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENTG
1D Price
Change %
ENTG100%
-4.44%
LSCC - ENTG
78%
Closely correlated
-3.80%
NXPI - ENTG
77%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
MCHP - ENTG
77%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
ON - ENTG
76%
Closely correlated
-4.44%
SLAB - ENTG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
More

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
-6.62%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
-4.68%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
VECO - MU
70%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
More