Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FARO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FARO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
FARO (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while LGL (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.12%.
FARO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2024.
LGL is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2024.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
@Electronic Components (+1.01% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
FARO | LGL | FARO / LGL | |
Capitalization | 408M | 34M | 1,200% |
EBITDA | -35.34M | -1.28M | 2,769% |
Gain YTD | -4.616 | 3.420 | -135% |
P/E Ratio | 48.78 | 211.67 | 23% |
Revenue | 359M | 1.81M | 19,878% |
Total Cash | 96.3M | 40.8M | 236% |
Total Debt | 89M | 587K | 15,162% |
FARO | LGL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FARO's Valuation (63) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as LGL (81). This means that FARO’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.
LGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for FARO (100). This means that LGL’s stock grew significantly faster than FARO’s over the last 12 months.
LGL's SMR Rating (89) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FARO (95). This means that LGL’s stock grew similarly to FARO’s over the last 12 months.
LGL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FARO (53). This means that LGL’s stock grew similarly to FARO’s over the last 12 months.
LGL's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for FARO (100). This means that LGL’s stock grew significantly faster than FARO’s over the last 12 months.
FARO | LGL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 9 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 9 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 9 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 9 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 9 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago70% | 14 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 17 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 9 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FARO has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FARO jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FARO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FARO | 100% | -0.56% | ||
NOVT - FARO | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
VPG - FARO | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
ESE - FARO | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
ST - FARO | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
MLAB - FARO | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGL and KULR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGL and KULR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LGL | 100% | N/A | ||
KULR - LGL | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.32% | ||
FN - LGL | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
CLS - LGL | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
OSIS - LGL | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
FLEX - LGL | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
More |