Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FCN (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -1.36% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.
FCN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
FCN | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FCN | RWK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago71% | 22 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCN and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCN and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FCN | 100% | -1.52% | ||
CBZ - FCN | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
BAH - FCN | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
ICFI - FCN | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
LAUR - FCN | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
HURN - FCN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWK has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RWK jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RWK | 100% | -1.09% | ||
ITT - RWK | 81% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
AVNT - RWK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
SSB - RWK | 77% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
PII - RWK | 77% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
MIDD - RWK | 77% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More |