Advertisement
FFBC vs UCTT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and UCTT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCTT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UCTT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCTT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UCTT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.32% price change this week, while UCTT (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
UCTT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.33% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Semiconductors (+1.32% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| FFBC | UCTT | FFBC / UCTT | |
| Capitalization | 2.08B | 2.04B | 102% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 99.2M | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.534 | -30.737 | 18% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.15 | 43.86 | 19% |
| Revenue | 840M | 1.73B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 213M | 307M | 69% |
| Total Debt | 1.28B | 640M | 200% |
FFBC | UCTT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFBC's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCTT (62) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (93) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (86) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
UCTT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FFBC (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UCTT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.
FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCTT (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
| FFBC | UCTT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMAGX | 12.70 | 0.08 | +0.63% |
| Invesco Advantage International R5 | |||
| STBIX | 471.84 | 2.53 | +0.54% |
| State Street Equity 500 Index Svc | |||
| RMMTX | 18.84 | 0.08 | +0.43% |
| Russell Inv Emerging Markets M | |||
| PGEJX | 27.11 | 0.09 | +0.33% |
| George Putnam Balanced R6 | |||
| ICERX | 44.09 | 0.12 | +0.27% |
| NYLI Epoch International Chc SIMPLE Cl | |||
FFBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFBC | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| UBSI - FFBC | 92% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CBU - FFBC | 92% Closely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| EBC - FFBC | 92% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| HOPE - FFBC | 91% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| BANR - FFBC | 91% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||
UCTT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCTT has been closely correlated with ICHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCTT jumps, then ICHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCTT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCTT | 100% | -4.16% | ||
| ICHR - UCTT | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LRCX - UCTT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| VECO - UCTT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KLIC - UCTT | 73% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| AMAT - UCTT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||