Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNSX vs FSHAX
FGNSX vs FSHAX Comparison
Open Charts FGNSX vs FSHAX
FGNSX vs FSHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNSX vs. FSHAX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNSX is a Hold and FSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNSX has more cash in the bank: 2.97B vs. FSHAX (428M). FGNSX pays higher dividends than FSHAX: FGNSX (3.07) vs FSHAX (2.88). FGNSX was incepted earlier than FSHAX: FGNSX (8 years) vs FSHAX (24 years). FSHAX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FGNSX (0.34). FGNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSHAX (29.00). FGNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSHAX: FGNSX (0) vs FSHAX (2500). FGNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. FSHAX (2.81). FGNSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.65 vs. FSHAX (6.49).
| FGNSX | FSHAX | FGNSX / FSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.63 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.71 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.236 | 0.858 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.97B | 428M | 694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.88 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | 2.81 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 9.48 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.65 | 6.49 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers