Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTQX vs NCSPX
FKTQX vs NCSPX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs NCSPX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
Nuveen CA Municipal Bond I
Price$9.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FKTQX vs NCSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. NCSPX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and NCSPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. NCSPX (1.65B). NCSPX (4.02) and FKTQX (3.91) have matching dividends . FKTQX was incepted earlier than NCSPX: FKTQX (8 years) vs NCSPX (39 years). NCSPX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.47). NCSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). NCSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: NCSPX (100000) vs FKTQX (1000000). NCSPX (-2.26) and FKTQX (-2.31) have marching annual gain over last year. NCSPX return over 5 years is better than : -2.66 vs. FKTQX (-5.41).
| FKTQX | NCSPX | FKTQX / NCSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.54 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.54 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.126 | -3.265 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.65B | 752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.91 | 4.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.31 | -2.26 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.88 | 3.58 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.41 | -2.66 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement