Analysis and predictions FNCL vs RJF
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCL is a Hold and RJF is a Hold.
RJF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FNCL | RJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 62% |
FNCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNCL has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNCL jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNCL | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| BAC - FNCL | 84% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| HBAN - FNCL | 82% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| PRU - FNCL | 81% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| PFG - FNCL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| USB - FNCL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
RJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RJF | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| SF - RJF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| SCHW - RJF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| VOYA - RJF | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| MS - RJF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| LPLA - RJF | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||