Advertisement
FSLR vs INTC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? First Solar (FSLR) vs. Intel (INTC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FSLR trades at a forward PE of around 13x with positive EPS of $14.21 TTM, contrasting INTC's elevated trailing PE over 900x and negative EPS of -$0.06 TTM.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks under pressure, with FSLR down sharply after weak 2026 guidance and INTC facing supply chain scrutiny amid a monthly decline.
- INTC boasts a larger market cap of $217B versus FSLR's $20B, offering greater scale in semiconductors but higher volatility exposure.
- Year-to-date, INTC leads with 18% gains compared to FSLR's 28%, though both lag broader indices in recent weeks due to sector headwinds.
- Sector dynamics favor INTC's AI and data center growth potential over FSLR's solar policy-sensitive demand.
- Analyst targets suggest upside for both: 36% for FSLR to $258 and 9% for INTC to $47.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FSLR (First Solar), a leader in thin-film photovoltaic solar modules, against INTC (Intel), a semiconductor giant focused on CPUs, GPUs, and foundry services. Both operate in technology-driven sectors sensitive to innovation cycles, supply chains, and macroeconomic shifts. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term growth in renewables versus AI infrastructure will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning amid recent volatility.
FSLR Overview and Recent Performance
First Solar, headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, specializes in cadmium telluride thin-film solar modules for utility-scale projects, serving utilities and large energy buyers globally. The company benefits from U.S. manufacturing expansions and policy support for renewables. In recent market activity, FSLR shares have declined significantly, trading around $189 with a 52-week range of $117-$286. This pullback stems from disappointing Q4 earnings that beat revenue estimates at $1.68B but missed EPS, coupled with 2026 guidance of $4.9B-$5.2B in sales well below expectations, prompting analyst downgrades from firms like Evercore ISI and Baird. Sentiment has softened due to policy uncertainties and softer pricing, though YTD gains stand at 28% and analysts maintain a moderate buy consensus with a $258 target.
INTC Overview and Recent Performance
Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, designs and manufactures semiconductors across client computing, data center/AI, and foundry segments, powering PCs, servers, and edge devices worldwide. Recent weeks have seen INTC shares fluctuate around $43, within a 52-week range of $18-$55, amid a monthly drop of over 12%. Key influences include U.S. lawmaker scrutiny over national security risks from Chinese-linked chip tools, board leadership changes with Chair Frank Yeary's retirement, and strategic reviews of 18A manufacturing tech. Despite negative TTM EPS and high valuations, YTD performance reaches 18% with strong server demand noted by the CFO, and a $47 average target reflects cautious optimism in AI growth.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated for current market conditions from hundreds available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse AI/ML strategies on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, blending technical and fundamental analysis. Impressive stats include annualized returns up to +218%, win rates ranging 53%-95%, and profit factors to 25.8, with some handling 25 tickers like those in semiconductors (e.g., SMH bot at +77% return, 72% win rate) or multi-sector mixes including oil and aerospace. Traders can explore varying styles, from short-term scalps to momentum plays, to suit their risk profiles. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover bots aligned with today’s volatility.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FSLR and INTC diverge sharply in business models: First Solar’s asset-light manufacturing ties growth to renewable demand and subsidies, while Intel’s integrated design-foundry approach leverages AI/data center tailwinds but grapples with competition from TSMC and Nvidia. Valuation contrasts highlight FSLR’s attractive 13x PE and positive profitability versus INTC’s premium multiples amid losses. Recent momentum favors neither, with both posting monthly declines amid sector rotations—solar facing policy risks, semis supply concerns. Risk profiles show FSLR’s higher beta (1.65) amplifying volatility, while INTC (beta 1.38) offers scale ($217B cap). Market sentiment tilts toward Intel’s AI catalysts over solar’s cyclical exposure.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors INTC over FSLR, driven by superior year-to-date momentum, expansive AI/server growth prospects, and larger-scale positioning despite recent headwinds. FSLR’s earnings stability provides a valuation edge, but inconsistent trends and policy reliance weigh on near-term probability. Observable factors like Intel’s demand signals suggest higher relative upside potential in prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLR is a Hold and INTC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FSLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FSLR (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while INTC (@Semiconductors) price change was +22.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSLR is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
INTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-1.79% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| FSLR | INTC | FSLR / INTC | |
| Capitalization | 21.2B | 310B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 2.15B | 14.4B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | -24.492 | 67.263 | -36% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.88 | 904.17 | 2% |
| Revenue | 5.22B | 52.9B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 2.86B | 37.4B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 655M | 46.6B | 1% |
FSLR | INTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSLR's Valuation (91) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as INTC (96) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as INTC (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's SMR Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (89) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
INTC's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSLR (53) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that INTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSLR’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (86) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
| FSLR | INTC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTGD | 29.50 | 0.51 | +1.75% |
| STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF | |||
| XTJL | 39.73 | 0.21 | +0.53% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul | |||
| IWF | 445.21 | 2.06 | +0.46% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |||
| PAUG | 43.75 | 0.13 | +0.30% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BufferETFAug | |||
| KBA | 31.03 | N/A | N/A |
| KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF | |||
INTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 100% | +4.70% | ||
| LRCX - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| AMAT - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| KLIC - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +6.14% | ||
| FORM - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| VECO - INTC | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
More | ||||