FTHM
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.04 (-2.63%)
Updated
Apr 19, 6:59 PM EST
19 days until earnings call
RDFN
Price
$5.20
Change
-$0.10 (-1.89%)
Updated
Apr 19, 6:59 PM EST
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price FTHM vs RDFN

Header iconFTHM vs RDFN Comparison
Open Charts FTHM vs RDFNBanner chart's image
Fathom Holdings
Price$1.48
Change-$0.04 (-2.63%)
Volume$25.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Redfin
Price$5.20
Change-$0.10 (-1.89%)
Volume$3.19M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FTHM vs RDFN Comparison Chart

Loading...

FTHMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
RDFNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FTHM vs. RDFN commentary
Apr 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHM is a StrongBuy and RDFN is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2024
Stock price -- (FTHM: $1.48 vs. RDFN: $5.20)
Brand notoriety: FTHM and RDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTHM: 69% vs. RDFN: 94%
Market capitalization -- FTHM: $41.34M vs. RDFN: $782.22M
FTHM [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $41.34M. RDFN’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $782.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTHM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDFN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTHM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTHM is a better buy in the long-term than RDFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTHM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDFN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RDFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FTHM and RDFN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FTHM (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -17.78% price change this week, while RDFN (@Real Estate Development) price change was -13.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTHM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

RDFN is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.49% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FTHM with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for RDFN with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDFN($782M) has a higher market cap than FTHM($41.3M). RDFN YTD gains are higher at: -49.612 vs. FTHM (-58.774). FTHM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -17.31M vs. RDFN (-53.04M). RDFN has more cash in the bank: 192M vs. FTHM (7.4M). FTHM has less debt than RDFN: FTHM (17.6M) vs RDFN (1.01B). RDFN has higher revenues than FTHM: RDFN (977M) vs FTHM (345M).
FTHMRDFNFTHM / RDFN
Capitalization41.3M782M5%
EBITDA-17.31M-53.04M33%
Gain YTD-58.774-49.612118%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue345M977M35%
Total Cash7.4M192M4%
Total Debt17.6M1.01B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDFN: Fundamental Ratings
RDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTHMRDFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FTHMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
RDFNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UDPIX66.960.75
+1.13%
ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 Inv
FMXSX7.08-0.06
-0.84%
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index Svc
HGITX49.31-0.44
-0.88%
Hartford Core Equity R5
DWGFX10.03-0.11
-1.08%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc F1
CGJIX55.93-0.88
-1.55%
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx I

FTHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHM and DOMA have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHM and DOMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTHM
1D Price
Change %
FTHM100%
-2.63%
DOMA - FTHM
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
COMP - FTHM
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
RDFN - FTHM
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
KW - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
EXPI - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More

RDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDFN has been closely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RDFN jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDFN
1D Price
Change %
RDFN100%
-2.07%
OPEN - RDFN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
COMP - RDFN
66%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
HOUS - RDFN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
EXPI - RDFN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
HHH - RDFN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More