Advertisement
GFF vs RGT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a Hold and RGT is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
GFF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GFF | RGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
RGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGT has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGT jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGT | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| APAM - RGT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| ESAB - RGT | 48% Loosely correlated | -17.24% | ||
| APG - RGT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| GFF - RGT | 35% Loosely correlated | -13.75% | ||
| SII - RGT | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||