This stock comparison examines HBAN (Huntington Bancshares), a regional bank with a Midwest and expanding Southern focus, against JPM (JPMorgan Chase), the largest U.S. bank by market cap offering diversified global services. Investors seeking exposure to banking—whether value-oriented regional plays or stable megabank resilience—will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. Recent sector pressures from interest rates and credit concerns highlight contrasts in scale, momentum, and risk, aiding decisions on portfolio allocation in the current environment.
Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) operates as a regional bank primarily in the Midwest, with commercial banking, consumer lending, and wealth management services. In recent weeks, the stock has faced pressure, trading around $15.64 with a market cap of $31.75 billion. Year-to-date returns stand at -9.86%, lagging the S&P 500, amid broader market activity. A key catalyst was the February 2026 completion of its merger with Cadence Bank, adding 390 branches in Texas and the South, pushing assets to $279 billion. This inorganic growth enhances deposit and loan diversity but raises integration costs and valuation questions, contributing to share weakness. Analysts remain optimistic, with targets up to $23 and recent upgrades from Morgan Stanley citing sector tailwinds. Trailing P/E at 11.25 and forward at 9.65 suggest relative value, supported by 28.74% profit margins and ROE of 10.10%.
JPMorgan Chase (JPM) is a global leader in consumer banking, investment banking, asset management, and commercial services, with unmatched scale. Shares recently closed at $287.52, reflecting a $775 billion market cap. Recent market activity shows YTD returns of -10.37% and one-year gains of 28.05%, impacted by sector headwinds. In recent weeks, JPM tightened lending in private credit due to AI-exposed software loan risks, prompting markdowns but also a Strong Buy upgrade amid undervaluation views. Earnings estimates have improved, with consensus targets near $345 implying solid upside. Key metrics include a trailing P/E of 14.36, forward P/E of 13.42, 33.91% profit margins, and ROE of 16.13%, underscoring operational strength despite volatility.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—short-term signals, risk-managed virtual portfolios, or brokerage executions—with impressive stats like annualized returns up to +216%, win rates from 53% to 95%, profit factors exceeding 25, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 22. For instance, a JPM-focused bot delivers +28% annualized return, 80% win rate, and 4x profit factor over 4-day trades. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions earn trending status, adapting to volatility in sectors like finance and tech. Traders can explore these for copy trading insights tailored to current markets—visit the page to evaluate performance firsthand.
HBAN and JPM operate in banking but differ sharply in scale: HBAN's $7.69B revenue and regional lending contrast JPM's $168B revenue and global diversification across investment banking and asset management. Growth for HBAN hinges on merger synergies like Southern expansion, while JPM leverages trading and fee income. Recent momentum favors neither amid YTD declines, but JPM's one-year +28% outpaces HBAN's +13%. Risk factors include HBAN's integration execution versus JPM's credit exposures in private markets. Both share sector vulnerabilities to rates, yet JPM's higher Price/Book (2.26 vs. 1.50) reflects premium stability; HBAN offers value via lower P/E. Sentiment tilts positive for both, with JPM's upgrades signaling resilience.
Tickeron’s AI leans toward JPM in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency from diversified revenue, higher ROE, and Strong Buy consensus amid undervaluation. HBAN's merger catalyst adds growth potential, but integration risks temper short-term stability. Probabilistic edge to JPM for relative positioning and lower volatility, though both merit monitoring for bank sector recovery.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJPM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.74% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was +5.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.99%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +4.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.50%.
HBAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Major Banks (+4.00% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| HBAN | JPM | HBAN / JPM | |
| Capitalization | 33.4B | 831B | 4% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.630 | -2.905 | 159% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.78 | 15.48 | 76% |
| Revenue | 8.13B | 182B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 21.7B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 18.5B | 500B | 4% |
HBAN | JPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBAN's Valuation (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (84) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBAN’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBAN (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
| HBAN | JPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 62% | 16 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 53% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.