This comparison examines HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and KVYO (Klaviyo, Inc.), two CRM-focused software providers navigating a challenging market. Both companies offer cloud-based platforms integrating marketing, sales, and service tools enhanced by AI capabilities. Investors and traders interested in software-as-a-service (SaaS) stocks with growth potential in customer relationship management (CRM) will find this analysis relevant, particularly amid recent sector rotations and AI-driven innovations. The review highlights relative performance, financial metrics, and market positioning to inform stock comparison decisions.
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) delivers a comprehensive cloud-based CRM platform, including Marketing Hub, Sales Hub, Service Hub, and AI-powered Breeze tools for mid-market businesses. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $246, with a market cap of approximately $12.7 billion. It has delivered a YTD return of 38.68% and 61.51% over one year, outperforming benchmarks despite broader software sector pressures from AI disruption fears.
TTM revenue stands at $3.13 billion, with quarterly growth of 20.4% year-over-year. Profit margin is 1.47%, and forward P/E is 19.88. Sentiment has been influenced by analyst price target adjustments and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on May 7, amid a re-rating in software valuations. The stock's resilience stems from consistent revenue expansion and AI integrations, though high trailing P/E of 287.71 signals growth expectations.
Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) specializes in a B2C CRM platform with marketing automation, analytics, and AI agents for e-commerce brands. Shares recently traded near $15.84 after a sharp post-earnings drop, with a market cap of about $4.7 billion. YTD return is 51.52%, but one-year performance reflects volatility near 52-week lows of $15.31.
TTM revenue is $1.23 billion, with Q1 2026 growth of 28% to $358 million, beating estimates and prompting raised full-year guidance to $1.514-$1.522 billion. Non-GAAP operating margins hit record highs, though profit margin remains negative at -2.57%. Recent sentiment ties to strong enterprise adoption and AI enhancements like Customer Agent, tempered by sector selloffs and SMS cost pressures. Forward P/E is 27.10, indicating higher growth pricing.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 351 total bots that deploy diverse strategies across thousands of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots feature varying styles—from momentum and sector rotation to short-term scalping—with performance stats like annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70. Selected for current market conditions, they target high-growth areas such as semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays, often outperforming benchmarks with Sharpe ratios above 2.0. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots overall, enabling users to copy top performers via integrated brokerage signals. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with your risk profile and market outlook.
HubSpot (HUBS) and Klaviyo (KVYO) both emphasize AI-enhanced CRM but differ in focus: HUBS serves broader B2B mid-market needs with a full-suite platform, while KVYO targets B2C e-commerce via data-driven marketing. Growth drivers include KVYO's faster 29.6% quarterly revenue growth and international/enterprise momentum versus HUBS's scale at $3.13B TTM revenue.
Recent momentum favors neither amid software selloffs, with both near lows but HUBS showing stronger YTD returns. Risk factors: KVYO faces e-commerce dependency (78% Shopify-linked) and negative margins; HUBS contends with high valuation multiples. Sector exposure is SaaS/CRM, with sentiment pressured by AI fears but buoyed by product catalysts like agents and Breeze AI. Trade-offs: HUBS offers stability and profitability; KVYO higher growth potential.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward HUBS due to its trend consistency, positive profitability, lower forward valuation, and larger scale amid sector volatility. KVYO's superior recent growth and raised guidance present upside, but post-earnings reaction highlights risks. Observable factors like relative stability and catalysts position HUBS favorably in the near term, though probabilities shift with upcoming earnings and market rotations.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKVYO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KVYO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while KVYO (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.76%.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
KVYO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HUBS | KVYO | HUBS / KVYO | |
| Capitalization | 10.2B | 4.3B | 237% |
| EBITDA | 267M | -22.11M | -1,208% |
| Gain YTD | -50.566 | -55.713 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 104.41 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.3B | 1.31B | 251% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 985M | 172% |
| Total Debt | 247M | 117M | 211% |
HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HUBS | KVYO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 89% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TAXE | 50.84 | -0.22 | -0.44% |
| T. Rowe Price Intermediate Muncpl IncETF | |||
| IIF | 21.48 | -0.17 | -0.79% |
| Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | |||
| FVAL | 77.51 | -0.75 | -0.96% |
| Fidelity Value Factor ETF | |||
| IVSS | 27.58 | -0.41 | -1.46% |
| Applied Finance IVS US SMID ETF | |||
| CTEC | 71.84 | -1.08 | -1.48% |
| Global X ClimateTech ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +8.13% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 75% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 74% Closely correlated | +8.16% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | +5.05% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| CLSK - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.15% | ||
More | ||||