HUBS
Price
$198.38
Change
+$14.92 (+8.13%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
10.16B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KVYO
Price
$14.38
Change
+$0.04 (+0.28%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.3B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs KVYO

Header iconHUBS vs KVYO Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs KVYOBanner chart's image
HUBS vs KVYO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Klaviyo (KVYO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both HUBS and KVYO operate in the CRM software sector, facing recent pressure from broader software selloffs amid AI disruption concerns.
  • KVYO reported Q1 2026 revenue of $358 million, up 28% year-over-year, beating estimates and raising full-year guidance, though shares dropped sharply post-earnings.
  • HUBS shows strong YTD return of 38.68% with TTM revenue of $3.13 billion (20.4% quarterly growth), ahead of its Q1 earnings on May 7, 2026.
  • HUBS trades at a forward P/E of 19.88, lower than KVYO's 27.10, reflecting relative valuation differences.
  • Enterprise and international expansion drives growth for both, with KVYO emphasizing AI agents and HUBS its Breeze AI platform.
  • Market sentiment reflects sector volatility, with both stocks near 52-week lows despite solid fundamentals.

Introduction

This comparison examines HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and KVYO (Klaviyo, Inc.), two CRM-focused software providers navigating a challenging market. Both companies offer cloud-based platforms integrating marketing, sales, and service tools enhanced by AI capabilities. Investors and traders interested in software-as-a-service (SaaS) stocks with growth potential in customer relationship management (CRM) will find this analysis relevant, particularly amid recent sector rotations and AI-driven innovations. The review highlights relative performance, financial metrics, and market positioning to inform stock comparison decisions.

HUBS Overview and Recent Performance

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) delivers a comprehensive cloud-based CRM platform, including Marketing Hub, Sales Hub, Service Hub, and AI-powered Breeze tools for mid-market businesses. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $246, with a market cap of approximately $12.7 billion. It has delivered a YTD return of 38.68% and 61.51% over one year, outperforming benchmarks despite broader software sector pressures from AI disruption fears.

TTM revenue stands at $3.13 billion, with quarterly growth of 20.4% year-over-year. Profit margin is 1.47%, and forward P/E is 19.88. Sentiment has been influenced by analyst price target adjustments and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on May 7, amid a re-rating in software valuations. The stock's resilience stems from consistent revenue expansion and AI integrations, though high trailing P/E of 287.71 signals growth expectations.

KVYO Overview and Recent Performance

Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) specializes in a B2C CRM platform with marketing automation, analytics, and AI agents for e-commerce brands. Shares recently traded near $15.84 after a sharp post-earnings drop, with a market cap of about $4.7 billion. YTD return is 51.52%, but one-year performance reflects volatility near 52-week lows of $15.31.

TTM revenue is $1.23 billion, with Q1 2026 growth of 28% to $358 million, beating estimates and prompting raised full-year guidance to $1.514-$1.522 billion. Non-GAAP operating margins hit record highs, though profit margin remains negative at -2.57%. Recent sentiment ties to strong enterprise adoption and AI enhancements like Customer Agent, tempered by sector selloffs and SMS cost pressures. Forward P/E is 27.10, indicating higher growth pricing.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 351 total bots that deploy diverse strategies across thousands of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots feature varying styles—from momentum and sector rotation to short-term scalping—with performance stats like annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70. Selected for current market conditions, they target high-growth areas such as semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays, often outperforming benchmarks with Sharpe ratios above 2.0. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots overall, enabling users to copy top performers via integrated brokerage signals. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with your risk profile and market outlook.

Head-to-Head Comparison

HubSpot (HUBS) and Klaviyo (KVYO) both emphasize AI-enhanced CRM but differ in focus: HUBS serves broader B2B mid-market needs with a full-suite platform, while KVYO targets B2C e-commerce via data-driven marketing. Growth drivers include KVYO's faster 29.6% quarterly revenue growth and international/enterprise momentum versus HUBS's scale at $3.13B TTM revenue.

Recent momentum favors neither amid software selloffs, with both near lows but HUBS showing stronger YTD returns. Risk factors: KVYO faces e-commerce dependency (78% Shopify-linked) and negative margins; HUBS contends with high valuation multiples. Sector exposure is SaaS/CRM, with sentiment pressured by AI fears but buoyed by product catalysts like agents and Breeze AI. Trade-offs: HUBS offers stability and profitability; KVYO higher growth potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward HUBS due to its trend consistency, positive profitability, lower forward valuation, and larger scale amid sector volatility. KVYO's superior recent growth and raised guidance present upside, but post-earnings reaction highlights risks. Observable factors like relative stability and catalysts position HUBS favorably in the near term, though probabilities shift with upcoming earnings and market rotations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
HUBS vs. KVYO commentary
May 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and KVYO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (HUBS: $198.38 vs. KVYO: $14.38)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and KVYO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 175% vs. KVYO: 107%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $10.16B vs. KVYO: $4.3B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $10.16B. KVYO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $6.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKVYO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KVYO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KVYO is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KVYO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KVYO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than KVYO.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while KVYO (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

KVYO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.73% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($10.2B) has a higher market cap than KVYO($4.3B). HUBS YTD gains are higher at: -50.566 vs. KVYO (-55.713). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267M vs. KVYO (-22.11M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. KVYO (985M). KVYO has less debt than HUBS: KVYO (117M) vs HUBS (247M). HUBS has higher revenues than KVYO: HUBS (3.3B) vs KVYO (1.31B).
HUBSKVYOHUBS / KVYO
Capitalization10.2B4.3B237%
EBITDA267M-22.11M-1,208%
Gain YTD-50.566-55.71391%
P/E Ratio104.41N/A-
Revenue3.3B1.31B251%
Total Cash1.69B985M172%
Total Debt247M117M211%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSKVYO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KVYO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAXE50.84-0.22
-0.44%
T. Rowe Price Intermediate Muncpl IncETF
IIF21.48-0.17
-0.79%
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
FVAL77.51-0.75
-0.96%
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
IVSS27.58-0.41
-1.46%
Applied Finance IVS US SMID ETF
CTEC71.84-1.08
-1.48%
Global X ClimateTech ETF

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+8.13%
CRM - HUBS
75%
Closely correlated
+3.54%
TEAM - HUBS
74%
Closely correlated
+8.16%
NOW - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
+5.05%
S - HUBS
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
CLSK - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
More