IEFA
Price
$97.04
Change
-$0.45 (-0.46%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Net Assets
183.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHF
Price
$26.76
Change
-$0.12 (-0.45%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Net Assets
63.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEFA vs SCHF

Header iconIEFA vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs SCHFBanner chart's image
IEFA vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) vs. Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF)

Key Takeaways

  • IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index, providing broad exposure to over 2,600 large-, mid-, and small-cap developed market equities excluding U.S. and Canada, while SCHF follows the FTSE Developed ex US Index focused on large- and mid-cap stocks across approximately 1,500 holdings including Canada and South Korea.
  • SCHF offers a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to IEFA's 0.07%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both ETFs emphasize financials (around 22-23%) and industrials (19-20%), but SCHF has higher technology exposure (~13%) due to South Korean semiconductor firms, versus IEFA's broader small-cap diversification.
  • IEFA demonstrates superior liquidity with higher average daily volume and tighter bid-ask spreads, suitable for active trading.
  • SCHF exhibits slightly lower volatility profiles in recent market cycles, benefiting from its cost advantage and regional inclusions.
  • Structural differences position IEFA for deeper diversification and SCHF for efficient large-cap international beta.

Introduction

In the evolving landscape of global equity investing, iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) stand out as premier vehicles for developed markets ex-U.S. exposure. These passive ETFs compete directly in providing low-cost access to international diversification, appealing to investors seeking alternatives to U.S.-heavy portfolios amid shifting capital flows and macroeconomic drivers. While both target similar investor goals of broad sector exposure and long-term growth, differences in index methodology, holdings count, and regional scope offer nuanced choices for balancing cost, liquidity, and risk in today's ETF comparison environment.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index, a free float-adjusted, market-cap-weighted benchmark capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from developed markets in Europe, Australasia, and the Far East, excluding the U.S. and Canada. With approximately 2,631 holdings, it emphasizes comprehensive diversification. Top holdings include ASML Holding NV (2.21%), AstraZeneca PLC (1.23%), Novartis AG (1.21%), Roche Holding Par AG (1.19%), and HSBC Holdings PLC (1.13%). Sector allocations feature financials at 22.41%, industrials at 20.27%, health care at 10.10%, and information technology at 8.83%. The expense ratio is a competitive 0.07%, and the fund maintains high liquidity with a 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01% and average daily volume exceeding 20 million shares. As a passive ETF, IEFA employs representative sampling and rebalances in line with the index methodology, prioritizing structural stability over active bets.

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) Overview

The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) seeks to replicate the FTSE Developed ex US Index, comprising large- and mid-cap stocks from developed markets outside the U.S., including Canada and South Korea, across roughly 1,500 holdings. Key top holdings feature Samsung Electronics Ltd. (~2.2%), ASML Holding NV (~2.0%), SK Hynix Inc. (~1.3%), Novartis AG (~1.1%), and AstraZeneca PLC (~1.1%). Sector breakdown highlights financial services (~23%), industrials (~19%), technology (~13%), health care (~9%), and consumer cyclical (~8%). Boasting an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, SCHF delivers exceptional cost efficiency. It exhibits strong liquidity with low portfolio turnover around 4% and tight spreads. This passive structure ensures market-cap alignment with quarterly rebalancing tied to the FTSE index, focusing on efficient exposure to high-conviction developed international leaders.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Developed markets ex-U.S. equities navigate a dynamic environment shaped by persistent U.S. dollar softening, anticipated rate cuts across major central banks, and robust capital inflows into international ETFs. Recent months have seen equity ETF flows favoring non-U.S. segments, with developed ex-U.S. gathering billions amid AI-driven manufacturing shifts in Asia and resilient earnings from European industrials and financials. Macro drivers like geopolitical tensions, commodity rebounds, and fiscal stimulus in key economies bolster sector rotation toward value-oriented financials and materials. Risks include policy uncertainty from U.S. elections and inflation persistence, yet improving sovereign balance sheets and lower global yields support relative attractiveness versus U.S. large caps. Both ETFs benefit from this backdrop, capturing broad exposure amid ongoing diversification trends.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, IEFA and SCHF have mirrored broader developed ex-U.S. trends, with modest gains tied to sector rotation into financials and industrials amid dollar weakness and rate expectations. SCHF has occasionally edged ahead in total returns over multi-year cycles, aided by its lower costs and technology tilt from South Korean semiconductors during chip demand upswings. IEFA's inclusion of small-caps provides enhanced diversification, mitigating large-cap volatility seen in recent drawdowns (~29-30% over five years for both). Volatility profiles remain comparable, with betas near 0.85-1.0 relative to U.S. benchmarks, though SCHF shows marginally lower risk in sideways markets. Relative positioning favors both amid commodity tailwinds and geopolitical shifts, emphasizing their roles in balanced portfolios over isolated price action.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the strongest performing AI trading bots from its platform of over 350 agents, covering stocks, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies across growth sectors. Featuring 25 top bots out of hundreds, the section highlights real-time performers suited to current market conditions. Offerings include AI Trading Signal Agents for instant alerts with no balance minimums, Virtual Agents with customizable risk management, and Brokerage Agents leveraging Tickeron’s brokerage integration. Bots vary by timeframe (e.g., 60-minute intermediate, 15-minute, 5-minute expert), strategy (technical or fundamental), volatility tolerance (low, medium, high), and asset focus. This dynamic leaderboard empowers users to identify high-conviction opportunities; explore the page to discover bots aligning with your trading style today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHF due to its superior cost efficiency (0.03% expense ratio), broader regional exposure including Canada and South Korea, and consistent trend alignment in recent market cycles. While IEFA excels in holdings diversification and liquidity, SCHF's lower volatility and technology weighting position it advantageously amid semiconductor momentum and capital flow shifts. Probabilistic edge leans toward SCHF for structural strength in prolonged international rotations, though both suit diversified mandates.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IEFA vs. SCHF commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and SCHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 183B vs. SCHF (63.4B). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: SCHF (11.314) vs IEFA (8.473). IEFA was incepted earlier than SCHF: IEFA (14 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IEFA (0.07). SCHF has a higher turnover IEFA (3.00) vs IEFA (3.00).
IEFASCHFIEFA / SCHF
Gain YTD8.47311.31475%
Net Assets183B63.4B289%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.03233%
Turnover3.004.0075%
Yield3.523.40103%
Fund Existence14 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEFASCHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BULD30.900.09
+0.29%
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Fut ETF
FXI37.660.06
+0.16%
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
ROKT115.12-0.07
-0.06%
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFnlFrntrsETF
SPUT27.73-0.03
-0.11%
Innovator Eq Prm Inc -Daily PutWrite ETF
VVR3.14-0.02
-0.63%
Invesco Senior Income Trust

IEFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEFA
1D Price
Change %
IEFA100%
-0.46%
ASML - IEFA
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
SAP - IEFA
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
SHEL - IEFA
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
ROG - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
MC - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More

SCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHF
1D Price
Change %
SCHF100%
-0.45%
STM - SCHF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
SAN - SCHF
70%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
MT - SCHF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
BNT - SCHF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
BHP - SCHF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
More