IEFA
Price
$97.49
Change
+$1.31 (+1.36%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
180.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VEU
Price
$81.63
Change
+$1.12 (+1.39%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
83.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEFA vs VEU

Header iconIEFA vs VEU Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs VEUBanner chart's image
IEFA vs VEU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) vs. Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU)

Key Takeaways

  • IEFA provides targeted exposure to developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada via the MSCI EAFE IMI Index, while VEU offers broader coverage including emerging markets through the FTSE All-World ex-US Index.
  • VEU boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to IEFA's 0.07%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • IEFA holds approximately 2,631 stocks with top sectors in financials (22.41%) and industrials (20.27%); VEU diversifies across 3,877 holdings, tilting toward technology via emerging market leaders like Taiwan Semiconductor.
  • Both ETFs exhibit strong liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads around 0.01%, but IEFA's larger AUM ($171B) supports superior trading volume.
  • IEFA emphasizes stability in established economies like Japan and Europe; VEU introduces higher growth potential and volatility from emerging markets exposure (about 26%).
  • Risk profiles differ: IEFA shows lower standard deviation in recent cycles due to its developed-market focus, while VEU captures broader global trends.

Introduction

In the quest for international diversification, investors often weigh developed market purity against global breadth. The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) represent compelling alternatives for non-U.S. equity exposure. IEFA targets established economies in Europe, Australasia, and the Far East, excluding Canada, appealing to those seeking stability without emerging market volatility. VEU, conversely, encompasses both developed and emerging markets worldwide (ex-U.S.), providing comprehensive sector exposure including technology heavyweights. Amid shifting interest rate environments and geopolitical tensions, this ETF comparison highlights structural differences in exposure profiles, cost structures, and positioning to aid portfolio construction in today's interconnected markets.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is a passive fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index, which captures large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from 21 developed markets excluding the U.S. and Canada. Launched in 2012 by BlackRock, it holds 2,631 stocks for broad diversification.

Top holdings include ASML Holding NV (2.21%), AstraZeneca PLC (1.23%), Novartis AG (1.21%), Roche Holding Par AG (1.19%), and HSBC Holdings PLC (1.13%), representing about 11% of assets. Sector allocations emphasize financials (22.41%), industrials (20.27%), health care (10.10%), and information technology (8.83%). Geographically, key exposures are Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, and Germany.

With an expense ratio of 0.07%, IEFA features semi-annual distributions, high liquidity (30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01%), and AUM exceeding $171 billion. Its structure prioritizes low turnover and precise index replication, ideal for core international holdings focused on developed market growth.

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU), managed by Vanguard since 2007, tracks the FTSE All-World ex-US Index, encompassing large- and mid-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets outside the U.S. across nearly 50 countries. It maintains 3,877 holdings for extensive global reach.

Leading positions feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (3.73%), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (1.74%), ASML Holding NV (1.41%), Tencent Holdings Ltd. (1.00%), and SK Hynix Inc. (0.99%), totaling around 13% of the portfolio. While detailed sector weights vary, the fund balances financials, technology, and industrials, with notable emerging market tech influence. Regional splits include Europe (37.4%), Pacific (27.8%), emerging markets (25.9%), and North America ex-U.S. (7.7%).

Boasting a ultralow expense ratio of 0.04%, quarterly distributions, and AUM near $91 billion, VEU employs full replication with a 6.2% turnover rate. Its tight 0.01% bid-ask spread underscores robust liquidity, positioning it as a cost-effective vehicle for diversified ex-U.S. equity strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

International equities face a dynamic landscape shaped by monetary policy divergence, supply chain reshoring, and energy transitions. Developed markets in IEFA's purview benefit from robust corporate earnings in financials and industrials amid stabilizing inflation, while Europe's fiscal stimulus and Japan's wage growth provide tailwinds. Emerging markets within VEU contend with commodity volatility and U.S. dollar strength but gain from technology export booms and demographic advantages.

Capital flows favor diversified international exposure as U.S. valuations stretch, with regulatory pushes for supply chain resilience boosting Europe and Asia-Pacific industrials. Macro drivers like interest rate cuts and geopolitical risks in trade routes heighten sector rotation toward defensives like health care. Both ETFs navigate currency fluctuations and election cycles, underscoring the value of passive structures amid uncertain global growth.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IEFA has demonstrated resilience in developed markets, benefiting from European health care earnings and Japanese industrials amid yen stabilization. Its exclusion of emerging markets contributes to lower volatility, with a 3-year standard deviation around 12%, positioning it favorably in risk-averse rotations.

VEU, with emerging market exposure, has captured upside from Asian technology amid AI demand and semiconductor cycles, though it exhibits higher beta to global shocks. Relative to IEFA, VEU shows greater sensitivity to commodity trends and U.S. rate expectations, leading to divergent paths in recent months—VEU outperforming during risk-on phases driven by China stimulus, while IEFA holds steadier amid European stability. Both maintain consistent trend alignment with ex-U.S. benchmarks, differing primarily in volatility profiles.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and pattern recognition, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, consistently profitable bots earn trending status, often delivering annualized returns in the double digits for select instruments. This curated section empowers investors to deploy or replicate high-conviction signals efficiently. Explore the page to integrate cutting-edge AI into your strategy today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VEU due to its superior cost efficiency (0.04% expense ratio), broader diversification across developed and emerging markets, and exposure to high-momentum technology sectors amid global growth themes. While IEFA offers refined developed-market stability, VEU's structural advantages and trend consistency position it probabilistically stronger for capturing relative upside in recent cycles, assuming moderate risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IEFA vs. VEU commentary
Apr 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Hold and VEU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 181B vs. VEU (83.7B). VEU has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: VEU (11.039) vs IEFA (8.976). IEFA was incepted earlier than VEU: IEFA (14 years) vs VEU (19 years). VEU (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IEFA (0.07). VEU has a higher turnover IEFA (3.00) vs IEFA (3.00).
IEFAVEUIEFA / VEU
Gain YTD8.97611.03981%
Net Assets181B83.7B216%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.04175%
Turnover3.006.0050%
Yield3.522.93120%
Fund Existence14 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEFAVEU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VEU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLGG8.310.90
+12.20%
Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF
IBRN35.720.93
+2.67%
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
UPGD77.541.33
+1.74%
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Imp ETF
ONEV139.991.73
+1.25%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Russell 1000 LwVolFocETF
VOOV213.192.05
+0.97%
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

IEFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEFA
1D Price
Change %
IEFA100%
+1.36%
ASML - IEFA
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
SAP - IEFA
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
SHEL - IEFA
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.03%
ROG - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
MC - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More

VEU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VEU has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VEU jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VEU
1D Price
Change %
VEU100%
+1.39%
BHP - VEU
72%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
MT - VEU
71%
Closely correlated
+3.81%
SAN - VEU
70%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
TEL - VEU
67%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
FER - VEU
67%
Closely correlated
+2.86%
More