IEFA
Price
$97.03
Change
-$0.46 (-0.47%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
183.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VT
Price
$150.49
Change
-$0.35 (-0.23%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
79.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEFA vs VT

Header iconIEFA vs VT Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs VTBanner chart's image
IEFA vs VT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) vs. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT)

Key Takeaways

  • IEFA provides targeted exposure to developed markets outside North America (ex-US/Canada), tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index with 2,631 holdings, while VT offers comprehensive global coverage including US, developed ex-NA, and emerging markets via the FTSE Global All Cap Index with over 10,000 holdings.
  • Expense ratios are ultra-low for both: IEFA at 0.07% and VT slightly lower at 0.06%, making them cost-efficient for long-term international and global diversification.
  • IEFA emphasizes financials (22%) and industrials (20%), with no US exposure; VT is heavily weighted toward US large-caps like NVDA (3.75%) and technology (25%), with North America at 63%.
  • Both exhibit similar low turnover (around 3%), reflecting passive indexing strategies with quarterly or semi-annual rebalancing aligned to benchmarks.
  • IEFA shows higher volatility tied to international cycles, while VT benefits from US stability but faces concentration risk in mega-caps.
  • In recent market cycles, international developed equities have gained traction amid US dollar softening and global growth acceleration.

Introduction

In the evolving global equity landscape, IEFA and VT represent compelling options for investors seeking international diversification. IEFA focuses on developed markets in Europe, Australasia, and the Far East (EAFE), excluding the US and Canada, appealing to those tilting away from US dominance. VT, by contrast, delivers one-stop global exposure across developed and emerging markets, including substantial US weighting. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve overlapping goals: reducing home-country bias and capturing worldwide growth. Amid recent capital flows favoring non-US equities and shifting sector rotations, comparing their structures highlights trade-offs in breadth, cost, and risk for portfolio construction.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is a passive index fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index (IMI), which includes large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from 21 developed markets excluding the US and Canada. Launched in 2012 by BlackRock, it holds 2,631 stocks for broad coverage. Top holdings include ASML Holding NV (2.21%), AstraZeneca PLC (1.23%), Novartis AG (1.21%), Roche Holding Par AG (1.19%), and HSBC Holdings PLC (1.13%). Sector allocations feature financials at 22.41%, industrials at 20.27%, health care at 10.10%, and information technology at 8.83%. Its expense ratio is 0.07%, with semi-annual distributions and low portfolio turnover of about 3%. IEFA's structure emphasizes liquidity and precise tracking via representative sampling, ideal for ex-North America developed market exposure without emerging market volatility.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) Overview

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT), launched in 2008, passively tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index, encompassing large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets worldwide, covering nearly 98% of investable global equity market cap. It features over 10,000 holdings, with top positions dominated by US giants: NVDA (3.75%), AAPL (3.48%), MSFT (2.63%), AMZN (1.82%), and Alphabet Class A (1.64%). Regional breakdown shows North America at 63.20%, Europe 14.80%, Pacific 11.10%, and emerging markets 10.40%; sectors lean toward technology (25.34%), financial services (16.30%), and industrials. With a 0.06% expense ratio and 3.4% turnover, VT employs optimized sampling for minimal tracking error, offering seamless global diversification in a single, low-cost vehicle.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The international equity space faces a dynamic environment shaped by macroeconomic shifts, including potential US dollar weakening, accelerating global growth outside the US, and sector rotations toward value-oriented industrials and financials. Recent capital flows have surged into non-US developed markets, with $57 billion in US fund inflows to international equities in 2025, reflecting attractive valuations—non-US stocks trade at a 35% discount on forward P/E ratios versus US peers. Catalysts include earnings acceleration in Europe and Japan, AI supply chain diversification into Asia, and regulatory easing in key economies. Risks encompass geopolitical tensions, currency volatility, and slower-than-expected global rebalancing, yet structural tailwinds like multipolar trade dynamics favor broad international exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IEFA has navigated international volatility with resilience, benefiting from rotations into undervalued financials and industrials amid US large-cap concentration risks. In recent weeks, IEFA has shown relative strength tied to EAFE outperformance, while VT's heavier US tilt (63%) tempers gains but adds stability from mega-cap tech leaders like NVDA. Longer-term, VT's inclusion of emerging markets introduces modest volatility uplift, but both exhibit low tracking error. IEFA's ex-US focus amplifies sensitivity to dollar cycles and global growth, positioning it for outperformance in non-US rallies, whereas VT offers balanced relative positioning across cycles, with lower overall volatility due to diversification.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, vetted performers rise to this curated section, adapting dynamically to volatility, sector shifts, and macro trends. Explore these tools to enhance decision-making with data-backed signals tailored for ETFs like IEFA and VT. Visit today to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VT for its superior diversification across global markets, marginally lower expense ratio (0.06% vs. 0.07%), and balanced risk profile blending US stability with international upside. While IEFA excels in pure developed ex-NA exposure amid recent non-US momentum, VT's ~10,000 holdings mitigate concentration risks and capture broader trend consistency. Probabilistic edge to VT (60-65% confidence) based on structural breadth and cost efficiency in the prevailing multipolar environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IEFA vs. VT commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Hold and VT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 183B vs. VT (79.2B). IEFA has a higher annual dividend yield than VT: IEFA (8.976) vs VT (6.741). IEFA was incepted earlier than VT: IEFA (14 years) vs VT (18 years). VT (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than IEFA (0.07). IEFA (3.00) and VT (3.00) have matching turnover.
IEFAVTIEFA / VT
Gain YTD8.9766.741133%
Net Assets183B79.2B231%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.06117%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield3.521.82193%
Fund Existence14 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEFAVT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLLA30.450.17
+0.56%
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
BLKC20.63N/A
N/A
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF
QQHG62.99N/A
N/A
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
FISR25.86-0.02
-0.10%
State Street® Fixed Inc Sect RotationETF
SCHC50.65-0.35
-0.69%
Schwab International Small-Cap Eq ETF™

IEFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEFA
1D Price
Change %
IEFA100%
+1.36%
ASML - IEFA
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
SAP - IEFA
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
SHEL - IEFA
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.03%
ROG - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
MC - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More