Advertisement
KEYUF vs PBA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Keyera Corp. (KEYUF) vs. Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both KEYUF and PBA have delivered strong year-to-date gains of approximately 22%, trading near their 52-week highs amid steady energy demand.
- PBA provides a higher dividend yield at 4.43% compared to KEYUF's 3.98%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- PBA boasts a larger market capitalization ($26.85B vs. $8.85B) and lower trailing P/E ratio (23.90 vs. 28.18), suggesting better relative value.
- Recent momentum favors PBA with weekly gains of 7.15% over KEYUF's 6.29%, alongside lower beta (0.70 vs. 0.83) for reduced volatility.
- Tickeron's AI analysis leans toward PBA for superior scale, yield, and risk-adjusted returns in the current market.
Introduction
In the midstream energy sector, KEYUF (Keyera Corp.) and PBA (Pembina Pipeline Corporation) represent prominent Canadian operators focused on natural gas processing, transportation, and storage. This comparison is relevant for energy sector investors and traders evaluating relative performance amid fluctuating commodity prices and infrastructure demand. Both stocks have shown resilience in recent market activity, with gains driven by operational expansions and strategic partnerships. Traders seeking dividend stability or growth potential, as well as those monitoring sector rotation, will find insights into their business models, momentum, and risk profiles valuable for portfolio positioning.
KEYUF Overview and Recent Performance
Keyera Corp. (KEYUF) operates in the gathering and processing of natural gas (raw gas pipelines and plants that separate natural gas liquids or NGLs), liquids infrastructure (storage, fractionation, and transportation of NGLs like ethane, propane, butane, and condensate), and marketing segments. Headquartered in Calgary, it serves Canada and the U.S. markets. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around $38.93, near its 52-week high of $39.94, reflecting year-to-date gains of 21.63%. Sentiment has been influenced by anticipation around a pending acquisition of Plains assets, now targeting a May close, though facing regulatory scrutiny from the Competition Bureau. Upcoming Q1 2026 results on May 14 add to market focus, supporting upward price behavior amid broader energy infrastructure demand.
PBA Overview and Recent Performance
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) delivers energy transportation and midstream services via Pipelines (crude oil, oil sands, transmission with 3 million barrels per day capacity), Facilities (NGL fractionation, storage), and Marketing & New Ventures segments. Also Calgary-based, it targets Western Canadian and North American basins. Recently, shares have hovered near $46.50, close to the 52-week high of $46.70, with year-to-date returns of 23.19%. Positive sentiment stems from a business update highlighting 5-7% annual EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) growth through 2030, Apollo Funds' 40% stake in gas infrastructure, and analyst upgrades like CIBC's top pick status ahead of Q1 earnings. These catalysts have bolstered recent momentum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 available, each scanning thousands of tickers for real-time signals tailored to current market conditions like volatility in tech, commodities, and energy. These bots showcase impressive stats: annualized returns ranging from +23.46% to +162.28%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, profit factors up to 11.70, and trade durations from 1 day to 49 days across 1 to 18 tickers per bot. Strategies vary from short-term scalping in semiconductors and small-caps to longer holds in gold miners and data centers, with robust risk management via take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Explore these trending bots to align automated trading with prevailing trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both KEYUF and PBA operate similar midstream models centered on NGL handling and pipelines, but PBA's larger scale ($26.85B market cap vs. $8.85B) provides diversified exposure across higher-capacity assets. Growth drivers differ: KEYUF eyes frac expansions like KAPS Zone 4, while PBA emphasizes fee-based EBITDA growth and hedging (65% of 2026 frac spreads). Recent momentum slightly favors PBA with higher weekly gains and liquidity (1.47M vs. 98K avg. volume). Risk trade-offs include PBA's lower beta for stability versus KEYUF's higher cash reserves. Market sentiment reflects energy sector positioning, with PBA gaining from partnerships and KEYUF from M&A (mergers and acquisitions) potential amid regulatory hurdles.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors PBA over KEYUF, citing its larger scale, higher dividend yield, lower P/E ratio, and reduced volatility for potentially superior risk-adjusted returns in recent market conditions. While both exhibit strong trend consistency near highs and positive catalysts, PBA's relative valuation and stability provide a probabilistic edge, though short-term signals show KEYUF as a hold with acquisition upside.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KEYUF is a Hold and PBA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KEYUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KEYUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KEYUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KEYUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PBA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KEYUF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +9.04% price change this week, while PBA (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
PBA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.83% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| KEYUF | PBA | KEYUF / PBA | |
| Capitalization | 8.99B | 27.2B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 1.19B | 3.8B | 31% |
| Gain YTD | 22.195 | 22.832 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.39 | 24.05 | 118% |
| Revenue | 6.85B | 7.6B | 90% |
| Total Cash | 2.33B | 173M | 1,348% |
| Total Debt | 6.3B | 13.9B | 45% |
KEYUF | PBA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PBA's Valuation (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KEYUF (24) in the null industry. This means that PBA’s stock grew similarly to KEYUF’s over the last 12 months.
KEYUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as PBA (42) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that KEYUF’s stock grew similarly to PBA’s over the last 12 months.
PBA's SMR Rating (69) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KEYUF (93) in the null industry. This means that PBA’s stock grew similarly to KEYUF’s over the last 12 months.
PBA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KEYUF (47) in the null industry. This means that PBA’s stock grew similarly to KEYUF’s over the last 12 months.
PBA's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KEYUF (21) in the null industry. This means that PBA’s stock grew similarly to KEYUF’s over the last 12 months.
| KEYUF | PBA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBHG | 22.08 | N/A | -0.02% |
| iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| SHM | 47.77 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE S/T MuncplETF | |||
| GCAL | 50.79 | -0.11 | -0.21% |
| Goldman Sachs Dynamic CA Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
| AFRU | 9.29 | -0.20 | -2.11% |
| T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | |||
| CHPS | 82.53 | -3.52 | -4.09% |
| Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF | |||
KEYUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEYUF has been loosely correlated with PBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KEYUF jumps, then PBA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEYUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEYUF | 100% | +1.90% | ||
| PBA - KEYUF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| AM - KEYUF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| ENB - KEYUF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| PAA - KEYUF | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ET - KEYUF | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
More | ||||