AFL
Price
$80.28
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Apr 15, 6:59 PM EST
15 days until earnings call
LNC
Price
$27.88
Change
-$0.40 (-1.41%)
Updated
Apr 15, 6:59 PM EST
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions AFL vs LNC

Header iconAFL vs LNC Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs LNCBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$80.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$517.23K
CapitalizationN/A
Lincoln National
Price$27.88
Change-$0.40 (-1.41%)
Volume$410.08K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AFL vs LNC Comparison Chart

Loading...

AFLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
LNCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
AFL vs. LNC commentary
Apr 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and LNC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2024
Stock price -- (AFL: $85.19 vs. LNC: $31.60)
Brand notoriety: AFL: Not notable vs. LNC: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 55% vs. LNC: 76%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $49.4B vs. LNC: $5.42B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $49.4B. LNC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $5.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $21.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than LNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNC is a better buy in the short-term than AFL.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +5.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2024.

LNC is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.45% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for AFL with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LNC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($49.4B) has a higher market cap than LNC($5.42B). AFL has higher P/E ratio than LNC: AFL (10.95) vs LNC (9.80). LNC YTD gains are higher at: 19.044 vs. AFL (3.915). AFL has more cash in the bank: 77.6B vs. LNC (23B). LNC has less debt than AFL: LNC (5.95B) vs AFL (7.36B). AFL has higher revenues than LNC: AFL (18.8B) vs LNC (11.7B).
AFLLNCAFL / LNC
Capitalization49.4B5.42B912%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.91519.04421%
P/E Ratio10.959.80112%
Revenue18.8B11.7B161%
Total Cash77.6B23B337%
Total Debt7.36B5.95B124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs LNC: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
LNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (16) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (58). This means that LNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (100). This means that AFL’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (99). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (39). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNC (100). This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLLNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
47%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
LNCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTA25.340.39
+1.56%
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
HTUS39.80-0.14
-0.34%
Hull Tactical US ETF
ANGL28.75-0.12
-0.41%
VanEck Fallen Angel HiYld Bd ETF
IVRA14.02-0.16
-1.10%
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
BBSC62.19-0.72
-1.15%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
-1.03%
PRU - LNC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
BHF - LNC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
MET - LNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
CNO - LNC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
JXN - LNC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More