CMP vs LYB ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMP is a Hold and LYB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LYB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LYB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CMP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while LYB (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMP is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
LYB is expected to report earnings on Aug 02, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.32% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.77% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| CMP | LYB | CMP / LYB | |
| Capitalization | 643M | 33.1B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 106M | 4.64B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -47.351 | 7.130 | -664% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.97 | 15.75 | 387% |
| Revenue | 1.19B | 41.1B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 38.3M | 3.39B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 914M | 13B | 7% |
CMP | LYB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMP's Valuation (11) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as LYB (33). This means that CMP’s stock grew similarly to LYB’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMP (100). This means that LYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMP’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's SMR Rating (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMP (94). This means that LYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMP’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMP (92). This means that LYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMP’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMP (92). This means that LYB’s stock grew significantly faster than CMP’s over the last 12 months.
| CMP | LYB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 74% | 27 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 56% |
CMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMP has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| FCX - CMP | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| PLL - CMP | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| SCCO - CMP | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| MTRN - CMP | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| LAAC - CMP | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||
LYB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYB has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYB jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.