DDT
Price
$26.01
Change
-$0.40 (-1.51%)
Updated
Mar 27, 6:59 PM EST
M
Price
$19.84
Change
+$0.75 (+3.93%)
Updated
Mar 27, 6:59 PM EST
48 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DDT vs M ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconDDT vs M Comparison
Open Charts DDT vs MBanner chart's image
Dillard's Capital Trust I
Price$26.01
Change-$0.40 (-1.51%)
Volume$3.38K
CapitalizationN/A
Macy's
Price$19.84
Change+$0.75 (+3.93%)
Volume$2.44M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DDT vs M Comparison Chart

Loading...

DDTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
DDT vs. M commentary
Mar 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDT is a Buy and M is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 28, 2024
Stock price -- (DDT: $26.27 vs. M: $19.85)
Brand notoriety: DDT: Not notable vs. M: Notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDT: 154% vs. M: 70%
Market capitalization -- DDT: $0 vs. M: $5.44B
DDT [@Department Stores] is valued at $0. M’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $5.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DDT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • M’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, M is a better buy in the long-term than DDT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while M’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • M’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, M is a better buy in the short-term than DDT.

Price Growth

DDT (@Department Stores) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while M (@Department Stores) price change was -6.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

M is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+0.76% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl's Corporation, Macy's Inc., and Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for DDT with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for M with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDT YTD gains are higher at: 3.937 vs. M (-0.517).
DDTMDDT / M
CapitalizationN/A5.44B-
EBITDAN/A1.9B-
Gain YTD3.937-0.517-761%
P/E RatioN/A52.24-
RevenueN/A23.9B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A6.19B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DDT vs M: Fundamental Ratings
DDT
M
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1271
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DDT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for M (42) in the Department Stores industry. This means that DDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than M’s over the last 12 months.

M's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to DDT’s over the last 12 months.

M's SMR Rating (50) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDT’s over the last 12 months.

M's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as DDT (55) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to DDT’s over the last 12 months.

M's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew significantly faster than DDT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DDTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITOS13.190.84
+6.80%
iTeos Therapeutics
ATEC13.800.39
+2.91%
Alphatec Holdings
LBRDK57.091.59
+2.86%
Liberty Broadband Corp
BHFAO25.250.20
+0.82%
Brighthouse Financial
PET1.920.01
+0.52%
Wag! Group Co

DDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDT and JWN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDT and JWN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDT
1D Price
Change %
DDT100%
-0.16%
JWN - DDT
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.98%
KSS - DDT
19%
Poorly correlated
+8.14%
M - DDT
15%
Poorly correlated
+4.04%
DDS - DDT
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.71%
CBD - DDT
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%

M and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, M has been closely correlated with KSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if M jumps, then KSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To M
1D Price
Change %
M100%
+4.04%
KSS - M
67%
Closely correlated
+8.14%
JWN - M
62%
Loosely correlated
+6.98%
DDS - M
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
CBD - M
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
DDT - M
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%