MCDMF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
MDSMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

MCDMF vs MDSMF

Header iconMCDMF vs MDSMF Comparison
Open Charts MCDMF vs MDSMFBanner chart's image
MacDonald Mines Exploration
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
TEN SIXTY FOUR
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$75.63K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MCDMF vs MDSMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
MCDMF vs. MDSMF commentary
Nov 11, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDMF is a Hold and MDSMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 11, 2024
Stock price -- (MCDMF: $0.05 vs. MDSMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MCDMF and MDSMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCDMF: 1% vs. MDSMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MCDMF: $1.91M vs. MDSMF: $57.33M
MCDMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.91M. MDSMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCDMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDSMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCDMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDSMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCDMF is a better buy in the long-term than MDSMF.

Price Growth

MCDMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +141.05% price change this week, while MDSMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDSMF($57.3M) has a higher market cap than MCDMF($1.91M). MDSMF YTD gains are higher at: 49900.000 vs. MCDMF (29.014). MDSMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. MCDMF (-2.2M). MDSMF has more cash in the bank: 51.1M vs. MCDMF (118K). MCDMF has less debt than MDSMF: MCDMF (0) vs MDSMF (3.2M). MDSMF has higher revenues than MCDMF: MDSMF (147M) vs MCDMF (0).
MCDMFMDSMFMCDMF / MDSMF
Capitalization1.91M57.3M3%
EBITDA-2.2M31.9M-7%
Gain YTD29.01449900.0000%
P/E RatioN/A20.92-
Revenue0147M-
Total Cash118K51.1M0%
Total Debt03.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCDMF vs MDSMF: Fundamental Ratings
MCDMF
MDSMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9864
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3571
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
671
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDSMF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCDMF (79). This means that MDSMF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

MDSMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MCDMF (100). This means that MDSMF’s stock grew similarly to MCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

MDSMF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCDMF (98). This means that MDSMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

MCDMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDSMF (71). This means that MCDMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDSMF’s over the last 12 months.

MCDMF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDSMF (71). This means that MCDMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDSMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSBC17.990.18
+1.01%
Old Second Bancorp
MCW8.35-0.01
-0.12%
Mister Car Wash
EPSN5.94-0.06
-1.00%
Epsilon Energy Ltd
AEG6.54-0.17
-2.53%
Aegon Ltd
GNPX1.55-0.14
-8.28%
Genprex

MCDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDMF and OMMSF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDMF and OMMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCDMF
1D Price
Change %
MCDMF100%
+62.41%
OMMSF - MCDMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIDMF - MCDMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
ALKEF - MCDMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
OSIIF - MCDMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - MCDMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

MDSMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDSMF and ZIJMY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDSMF and ZIJMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDSMF
1D Price
Change %
MDSMF100%
N/A
ZIJMY - MDSMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
ALKEF - MDSMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
JNCCF - MDSMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
LONCF - MDSMF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
MAGE - MDSMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
More