Advertisement
MDLZ vs MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MDLZ offers a stable dividend yield of 3.31% with lower volatility (beta 0.40), appealing to income-focused investors amid recent cocoa cost pressures.
- MNST has delivered stronger recent momentum, with 1-year returns near 60% and YTD gains of 10.46%, driven by energy drink demand.
- Both stocks operate in consumer staples but differ in exposure: MDLZ in snacks/chocolate, MNST in beverages; MNST trades at a higher P/E of 48x versus MDLZ's 32x.
- Recent weeks show MDLZ up modestly (1-month ~3%) while reaffirming growth targets; MNST eyes Q4 earnings growth of 13% revenue.
- Market caps are comparable (~$78B for MDLZ, $83B for MNST), but MNST exhibits higher growth potential with elevated valuation risks.
Introduction
Mondelez International (MDLZ) and Monster Beverage (MNST) represent key players in the consumer staples sector, with MDLZ dominating snacks and chocolate, and MNST leading in energy drinks. This stock comparison evaluates their relative performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment of inflationary pressures and shifting consumer preferences. Traders seeking momentum may eye MNST's growth trajectory, while long-term investors might favor MDLZ's stability and dividends. Understanding these dynamics aids in assessing stock comparison opportunities amid broader market volatility.
MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance
Mondelez International (MDLZ), a global leader in biscuits, chocolate, and snacks with brands like Oreo and Cadbury, generates revenue across biscuits (49%), chocolate (31%), and other categories. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $60, with a 52-week range of $51.20-$71.15 and market cap near $78 billion. Recent weeks reflect modest gains, up about 3% over the past month and 12% YTD, outperforming the S&P 500's flat start.
Sentiment has been shaped by cocoa cost inflation impacting European chocolate volumes, prompting corrective actions like price-point focus and supply-chain resilience. Despite Q4 profit pressures, MDLZ reaffirmed long-term targets of 3-5% organic revenue growth and high single-digit EPS growth, bolstering confidence. Analysts maintain a positive outlook with average price targets around $67, underscoring core snacking strengths amid challenges.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage (MNST), a holding company focused on energy drinks like Monster Energy, Reign, and Bang, operates primarily in the Monster Energy Drinks segment, with additional strategic, alcohol, and other brands. The stock hovers near $85, with a 52-week range of $50.93-$84.88 and market cap around $83 billion. Recent performance shines, with 1-month gains of ~4%, 3-month up 16%, YTD 10%, and 1-year returns exceeding 60%, outpacing the S&P 500.
Investor sentiment benefits from resilient global energy drink demand, international expansion, and pricing actions. Ahead of Q4 earnings on February 26, expectations call for 13% revenue growth to $2.1 billion and 29% EPS rise, with analysts like Deutsche Bank raising targets to $88. While valuation concerns linger at a trailing P/E of 48x, strong category growth across regions supports upward momentum in recent market activity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of over 100 back-tested, forward-tested, and brokerage-verified AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots earn their spot through AI-driven analysis identifying those best suited to prevailing market conditions, such as volatility exploitation or hedging. Performance stats impress: annualized returns from +15% to +271%, win rates of 54%-95%, profit factors up to 35x, across timeframes like 5min to 60min, trading 1-8 tickers per bot with strategies blending technicals, fundamentals, and risk controls (e.g., 2-3% corridor TP/SL). Examples include semiconductor bots at +107% return (71% win rate) and ETF volatility plays exceeding 94% wins. Explore these diverse styles—short-term scalps to momentum trades—to enhance your portfolio; visit Trending AI Robots for real-time insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MDLZ and MNST both anchor consumer staples but diverge in models: MDLZ's diversified snacks face commodity risks like cocoa, while MNST's focused energy drinks leverage category expansion. Growth drivers contrast—MDLZ targets steady 3-5% organic growth via emerging markets; MNST pursues high-teens revenue via international pricing.
Recent momentum favors MNST (60% 1-year vs. MDLZ's flat), but MDLZ provides dividends (3.3% yield, none for MNST). Risk profiles differ: MDLZ lower beta (0.4), inflation-sensitive; MNST higher P/E signals growth premium but overvaluation risk. Sector exposure overlaps in non-alcoholic beverages/snacks, yet sentiment tilts bullish on MNST's catalysts versus MDLZ's resilience trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MNST based on superior trend consistency, recent momentum (e.g., 16% 3-month gains), and upcoming catalysts like Q4 earnings growth, positioning it favorably in growth-oriented relative performance. While MDLZ offers stability and dividends, MNST's relative strength in consumer staples suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance, though with elevated valuation considerations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDLZ is a Hold and MNST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.55% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +12.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.93%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +117462.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.10% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-2.03% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| MDLZ | MNST | MDLZ / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 78.3B | 83.9B | 93% |
| EBITDA | 5.23B | 2.71B | 193% |
| Gain YTD | 14.245 | 11.934 | 119% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.18 | 41.46 | 73% |
| Revenue | 39.3B | 8.79B | 447% |
| Total Cash | 1.52B | 2.99B | 51% |
| Total Debt | 21.6B | 199M | 10,854% |
MDLZ | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 20 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (30) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (69) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MNST (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
| MDLZ | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | about 1 month ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSWD | 35.46 | 0.81 | +2.34% |
| Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Eq ETF | |||
| CHW | 8.91 | 0.16 | +1.83% |
| Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund | |||
| VDE | 164.80 | 1.19 | +0.73% |
| Vanguard Energy ETF | |||
| PSTP | 36.58 | 0.11 | +0.29% |
| Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Stgy ETF | |||
| IBTP | 25.32 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Trsy ETF | |||