MDLZ
Price
$56.30
Change
-$1.00 (-1.74%)
Updated
Apr 21, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.55B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PEP
Price
$154.03
Change
-$2.96 (-1.89%)
Updated
Apr 21, 12:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
214.57B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDLZ vs PEP

Header iconMDLZ vs PEP Comparison
Open Charts MDLZ vs PEPBanner chart's image
MDLZ vs PEP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MDLZ trades at a trailing P/E of 29.3 with a 3.61% dividend yield, facing headwinds from cocoa costs and weak North America volumes, resulting in modest YTD gains of 2.8%.
  • PEP offers a lower P/E of 26.7, comparable 3.55% yield, and stronger YTD performance of 12.6%, bolstered by strategic acquisitions and price adjustments.
  • Both consumer staples stocks exhibit low betas around 0.37, providing defensive positioning amid market volatility, with PEP's larger $219B market cap offering greater scale.
  • Recent momentum favors PEP with Poppi acquisition and buybacks, while MDLZ contends with cautious 2026 guidance and input cost pressures.
  • Relative performance shows PEP outperforming over 1-year (9.3% vs. -15.8%) and longer horizons, highlighting superior stability.

Introduction

Mondelez International (MDLZ) and PepsiCo (PEP) represent leading consumer staples players, with MDLZ focused on snacks like Oreo and Cadbury, and PEP spanning beverages and Frito-Lay brands. This stock comparison evaluates their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning in the current environment of input cost volatility and shifting consumer demand. Investors seeking defensive staples exposure or traders eyeing relative strength in food and beverage will find insights into growth drivers, risks, and sentiment shifts relevant for portfolio decisions.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International (MDLZ), a global snacking powerhouse with brands including Oreo, Cadbury, and Milka, generates over 75% of revenue outside the U.S., emphasizing biscuits and chocolate. Shares recently traded around $55, reflecting a YTD gain of 2.8% but underperformance over the past year at -15.8%. Recent market activity has been pressured by elevated cocoa costs, weak North America volumes, and a cautious 2026 outlook projecting flat-to-2% organic growth. Q4 results beat expectations with 9.3% revenue growth, driven by pricing, yet analyst sentiments remain mixed amid leadership changes and sustainability investments. A trailing P/E of 29.3 and 3.61% yield underscore income appeal, though input inflation has tempered sentiment.

PEP Overview and Recent Performance

PepsiCo (PEP), a diversified giant in beverages (Pepsi, Gatorade) and snacks (Lay's, Doritos), benefits from global scale and a robust distribution network. Shares hovered near $160, delivering robust YTD returns of 12.6% amid broader sector resilience. Recent developments include the $1.95B Poppi acquisition to bolster health-focused sodas, up to 15% snack price cuts addressing affordability concerns, and a $10B buyback program. Despite a 5.7% near-term dip, analysts view it as undervalued by ~40%, with Q4 revenue up and gross margins improving to 54%. A trailing P/E of 26.7 and 3.55% yield, alongside low beta of 0.38, support steady performance in volatile conditions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, each backtested across thousands of tickers. These bots are curated based on real-time AI analysis for suitability in prevailing market conditions, featuring annualized returns ranging from 17% to over 200%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors up to 25.8. Diverse strategies include trend following, dip buying, hedging, and sector-specific plays on 5-60 minute timeframes, trading assets like semiconductors, aerospace, and consumer staples proxies. Virtual Agents incorporate risk management, appealing to varied trader styles. Explore these high-potential models to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MDLZ and PEP both anchor the consumer staples sector, but diverge in business models: MDLZ’s snack-centric portfolio (biscuits 49%, chocolate 31%) contrasts PEP’s balanced beverages-snacks split. Growth drivers include PEP’s acquisitions and pricing flexibility versus MDLZ’s emerging market reliance. Recent momentum favors PEP (YTD +12.6% vs. +2.8%), with superior scale ($219B vs. $71B market cap). Risk factors weigh heavier on MDLZ from commodity volatility, while PEP navigates volume softness via buybacks. Similar low betas (~0.37) and yields (~3.6%) highlight defensive traits, but PEP’s lower P/E signals better value.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors PEP based on stronger trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and catalysts like acquisitions and capital returns amid relative stability. Observable factors such as lower valuation multiples and resilient momentum position PEP more attractively versus MDLZ’s cost pressures, suggesting higher probability of near-term upside in staples rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MDLZ vs. PEP commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDLZ is a Hold and PEP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (MDLZ: $57.31 vs. PEP: $156.99)
Brand notoriety: MDLZ and PEP are both notable
MDLZ represents the Food: Specialty/Candy, while PEP is part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDLZ: 59% vs. PEP: 94%
Market capitalization -- MDLZ: $73.55B vs. PEP: $214.57B
MDLZ [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $73.55B. PEP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $214.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $73.55B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $324.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $14.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PEP is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PEP is a better buy in the short-term than MDLZ.

Price Growth

MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -6.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.23%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2127.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-6.12% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.24% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($215B) has a higher market cap than MDLZ($73.6B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than PEP: MDLZ (30.32) vs PEP (24.65). PEP YTD gains are higher at: 10.362 vs. MDLZ (7.387). PEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.5B vs. MDLZ (4.97B). MDLZ has less debt than PEP: MDLZ (21.8B) vs PEP (49.9B). PEP has higher revenues than MDLZ: PEP (93.9B) vs MDLZ (38.5B).
MDLZPEPMDLZ / PEP
Capitalization73.6B215B34%
EBITDA4.97B15.5B32%
Gain YTD7.38710.36271%
P/E Ratio30.3224.65123%
Revenue38.5B93.9B41%
Total CashN/A9.53B-
Total Debt21.8B49.9B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ vs PEP: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ
PEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1754
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8061
SMR RATING
1..100
7221
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5932
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PEP (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (80) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PEP (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDLZPEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAIL49.863.06
+6.54%
Direxion Daily Hmbldrs&Supls Bull 3X ETF
SOUX23.131.25
+5.72%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SOUN ETF
MBOX38.060.06
+0.15%
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
JHDV41.93N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
ACWX74.19-0.28
-0.38%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF